SCHWEIGER v. BOATWRIGHT
ROBERT SCHWEIGER |
WANDA BOATWRIGHT |
1:2019cv00717 |
July 19, 2019 |
US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
WILLIAM L OSTEEN |
JOE L WEBSTER |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 Letter to Clerk of Guilford County Court. re #9 Order of Remand. (Taylor, Abby) |
Filing 9 ORDER OF REMAND signed by JUDGE WILLIAM L. OSTEEN, JR on 09/05/2019, that this action is REMANDED to the General Court of Justice, District Court-Small Claims, in Guilford County, North Carolina, for further proceedings. The Clerk of Court is directed to send a certified copy of this Order to the Guilford County District Court Clerk. (Taylor, Abby) |
CASE REFERRED re: #7 Memorandum and Opinion, Recommended Ruling - Magistrate Judge, to JUDGE WILLIAM L. OSTEEN, JR. (Welch, Kelly) |
Filing 8 Notice of Mailing Recommendation. Objections to R&R due by 8/9/2019. Objections to R&R for Pro Se due by 8/12/2019. (Coyne, Michelle) |
Filing 7 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND RECOMMENDATION, signed by Magistrate Judge Joe L. Webster on 7/26/2019, that for the reasons stated herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's application to proceed in forma pauperis #1 is GRANTED for the sole purpose of entering this Order and Recommendation. IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that this case be REMANDED to the General Court of Justice, District Court-Small Claims, in Guilford County, North Carolina for further proceedings. (Coyne, Michelle) |
ORDER signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER on 7/26/2019. See document #7 . (Coyne, Michelle) |
Motion Referred to Magistrate Judge Joe L. Webster RE: #1 APPLICATION to Proceed IFP. (Coyne, Michelle) |
Case assigned to JUDGE WILLIAM L. OSTEEN, JR and MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER. (Coyne, Michelle) |
Filing 6 ANSWER to #3 Complaint by WANDA BOATWRIGHT. (Coyne, Michelle) |
Filing 5 CIVIL COVER SHEET. (Coyne, Michelle) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to WANDA BOATWRIGHT. (Original document issued in Guilford County Small Claims Court, Case Number 19CVM12008 and is listed as Exhibit 2 to the Petition for Removal) (Coyne, Michelle) |
Filing 3 COMPLAINT against WANDA BOATWRIGHT, filed by ROBERT SCHWEIGER. (original document filed in Guilford County Small Claims Court, Case Number 19CVM12008 and is listed as exhibit 1 to the Petition for Removal)(Coyne, Michelle) |
Filing 2 PETITION FOR REMOVAL against ROBERT SCHWEIGER, filed by WANDA BOATWRIGHT. (Attachments: #1 Complaint for Summary Ejectment, #2 Magistrate Summons)(Coyne, Michelle) |
Filing 1 APPLICATION to Proceed IFP by WANDA BOATWRIGHT. (Coyne, Michelle) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: SCHWEIGER v. BOATWRIGHT | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: ROBERT SCHWEIGER | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: WANDA BOATWRIGHT | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.