UWHARRIE CAPITAL CORP v. CDC FEDERAL CREDIT UNION
| Uwharrie Capital Corp and UWHARRIE CAPITAL CORP. |
| CDC Federal Credit Union |
| 1:2019cv00771 |
| July 30, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| CATHERINE C EAGLES |
| JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1051 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 2, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 STANDARD ORDER for civil cases proceeding before JUDGE CATHERINE C. EAGLES. (Sanders, Marlene) |
| Case assigned to JUDGE CATHERINE C. EAGLES and MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE. (Coyne, Michelle) |
| CASE REFERRED to Mediation pursuant to Local Rule 83.9b of the Rules of Practice and Procedure of this Court. Please go to our website under Attorney Information for a list of mediators which must be served on all parties. (Coyne, Michelle) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney DAVID RUFUS BOAZ on behalf of Plaintiff UWHARRIE CAPITAL CORP. (BOAZ, DAVID) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by UWHARRIE CAPITAL CORP. (BOAZ, DAVID) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CDC FEDERAL CREDIT UNION (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0418-2620197), filed by UWHARRIE CAPITAL CORP. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - U.S. Reg. No. 3,836,626, #2 Exhibit B - U.S. Reg. No. 5,683,265, #3 Exhibit C - U.S. Reg. No. 2,945,323) (BOAZ, DAVID) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
