FORD v. 3M COMPANY
| DOUGLAS FORD |
| 3M COMPANY |
| 1:2019cv00817 |
| August 9, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| L PATRICK AULD |
| CATHERINE C EAGLES |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Initial Pretrial Conference Hearing: Initial Pretrial Conference Hearing set for 10/28/2019 09:30 AM in Greensboro Courtroom #1A before MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD. (Garrett, Kim) |
| Filing 10 ANSWER to #5 Complaint with Jury Demand by 3M COMPANY. (THOMAS, JOHN) |
| Filing 9 STANDARD ORDER for civil cases proceeding before JUDGE CATHERINE C. EAGLES. (Sanders, Marlene) |
| Case assigned to JUDGE CATHERINE C. EAGLES and MAGISTRATE JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD. (Coyne, Michelle) |
| CASE REFERRED to Mediation pursuant to Local Rule 83.9b of the Rules of Practice and Procedure of this Court. Please go to our website under Attorney Information for a list of mediators which must be served on all parties. (Coyne, Michelle) |
| Filing 8 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #5 Complaint by 3M COMPANY. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(THOMAS, JOHN) |
| Filing 7 Notice of Right to Consent. Counsel shall serve the attached form on all parties. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(Coyne, Michelle) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to 3M COMPANY. (Original document issued in Forsyth County Superior Court, Case Number 19CVS3296 and is listed as Exhibit 1 to the Petition for Removal) (Coyne, Michelle) |
| Filing 5 COMPLAINT against 3M COMPANY, filed by DOUGLAS FORD. (Original document filed in Forsyth County Superior Court, Case Number 19CVS326 and is listed as exhibit 1 to the Petition for Removal)(Coyne, Michelle) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney ALYSSA M. RIGGINS on behalf of Defendant 3M COMPANY (RIGGINS, ALYSSA) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney JOHN ALLEN THOMAS on behalf of Defendant 3M COMPANY (THOMAS, JOHN) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by 3M COMPANY. (THOMAS, JOHN) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REMOVAL against Douglas Ford ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0418-2627906.), filed by 3M COMPANY. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Complaint)(THOMAS, JOHN) |
ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer filed by 3M COMPANY to 9/6/2019. Answer due by 9/6/2019. Signed by John Brubaker, Clerk of Court, on 08/09/2019. (Brubaker, John)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: FORD v. 3M COMPANY | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: 3M COMPANY | |
| Represented By: | ALYSSA M. RIGGINS |
| Represented By: | JOHN ALLEN THOMAS |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: DOUGLAS FORD | |
| Represented By: | R. MICHAEL ELLIOT |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
