PALOMO v. HOWARD
| OLGA RODRIGUEZ PALOMO |
| DONALD RAY HOWARD |
| 1:2019cv00884 |
| August 30, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| WILLIAM L OSTEEN |
| JOE L WEBSTER |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Roseboro Letter - Right to Respond to #9 Motion to Dismiss. (Daniel, J) |
| Filing 10 BRIEF re #9 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Petitioner OLGA RODRIGUEZ PALOMO filed by OLGA RODRIGUEZ PALOMO. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(PIERCE, WHITNEY) |
| Filing 9 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by OLGA RODRIGUEZ PALOMO. Response to Motion due by 11/18/2019 (PIERCE, WHITNEY) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF HEARING: Status Conference and Discovery Hearing set for 10/29/2019 02:00 PM in Greensboro Courtroom #1 before JUDGE WILLIAM L. OSTEEN JR.(Welch, Kelly) Modified on 10/11/2019 to edit time of hearing (NEF regenerated) (Welch, Kelly). |
| Reset Deadlines/Hearings: Status Conference and Discovery Conference set for 10/29/2019 02:00 PM in Greensboro Courtroom #1 before JUDGE WILLIAM L. OSTEEN JR. (Welch, Kelly) |
| Motion Submitted re: #6 MOTION for Hearing re #1 Complaint, to JUDGE WILLIAM L. OSTEEN, JR. (Welch, Kelly) |
| Filing 7 Counterclaim filed by DONALD RAY HOWARD. (Daniel, J) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Hearing re #1 Complaint, by OLGA RODRIGUEZ PALOMO. Responses due by 10/21/2019 (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(PIERCE, WHITNEY) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by DONALD RAY HOWARD. (Daniel, J) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by OLGA RODRIGUEZ PALOMO as to DONALD RAY HOWARD served on 9/11/2019, answer due 10/2/2019. Donald Ray Howard, AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE as to DONALD RAY HOWARD served on 9/11/2019, answer due 10/2/2019. (PIERCE, WHITNEY) |
| Filing 3 Notice of Right to Consent. Counsel shall serve the attached form on all parties. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(Coyne, Michelle) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to DONALD RAY HOWARD. (Coyne, Michelle) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT (Verified Petition for Return of a Child Under the Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction against DONALD RAY HOWARD ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0418-2644395.), filed by OLGA RODRIGUEZ PALOMO. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H)(PIERCE, WHITNEY) |
| Case assigned to JUDGE WILLIAM L. OSTEEN, JR and MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER. (Coyne, Michelle) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: PALOMO v. HOWARD | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: OLGA RODRIGUEZ PALOMO | |
| Represented By: | WHITNEY D. PIERCE |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: DONALD RAY HOWARD | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
