JONES v. ALVAREZ et al
| ZARED KINAH JONES |
| S.A. ALVAREZ, F.T. WRIGHT, WAYNE SCOTT, J.M. CHAVEZ, CITY OF GREENSBORO, K.R. JOHNSON and S.K. FLOWERS |
| 1:2019cv00930 |
| September 10, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| WILLIAM L OSTEEN |
| JOE L WEBSTER |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Set Deadlines: Responses due by 11/15/2019. (Butler, Carol)
|
|
TEXT ORDER granting #10 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer filed by S.A. ALVAREZ, J.M. CHAVEZ, CITY OF GREENSBORO, S.K. FLOWERS, K.R. JOHNSON, WAYNE SCOTT, F.T. WRIGHT. For good cause shown, Defendants shall have up to and including November 15, 2019 within which to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Issued by MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER on 10/15/2019.(Lee, Pedra)
|
|
Motion Referred re: #10 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #2 Complaint, to MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER (Welch, Kelly)
|
|
Filing 10
MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #2 Complaint by S.A. ALVAREZ, J.M. CHAVEZ, CITY OF GREENSBORO, S.K. FLOWERS, K.R. JOHNSON, WAYNE SCOTT, F.T. WRIGHT. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Granting Motion for Extension of Time to Answer/Respond to Complaint)(BENTON, JASON)
|
|
Filing 9
NOTICE of Appearance by attorney DANIEL E. PETERSON on behalf of Defendants S.A. ALVAREZ, J.M. CHAVEZ, CITY OF GREENSBORO, S.K. FLOWERS, K.R. JOHNSON, WAYNE SCOTT, F.T. WRIGHT (PETERSON, DANIEL)
|
|
Filing 8
NOTICE of Appearance by attorney JASON R. BENTON on behalf of Defendants S.A. ALVAREZ, J.M. CHAVEZ, CITY OF GREENSBORO, S.K. FLOWERS, K.R. JOHNSON, WAYNE SCOTT, F.T. WRIGHT (BENTON, JASON)
|
|
Filing 7
USMS Return Executed for Complaint, Summons, NTC as to City of Greensboro, JM Chavez, SS Alvarez, Korey Johnson, SK Flowers, Wayne Scott, SA Alvarez. (Coyne, Michelle)
|
|
Filing 6
Notice of Right to Consent. Counsel shall serve the attached form on all parties. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(Coyne, Michelle)
|
|
Filing 5
Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (Coyne, Michelle)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER signed by MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER on 09/11/2019, that the plaintiff in the above-entitled proceeding be, and is hereby, permitted to commence said proceeding in this Court without prepayment of fees or costs, or giving security therefor. [28 U.S.C. 1915(a)] Plaintiff is responsible for preparing and delivering to the Clerk, the correct summons for service on each defendant, including the correct address and the name and title of the individual to be served on behalf of a corporation, association, infant, incompetent or government agency. Failure to prepare and deliver said summons within 15 days from the filing of this order shall result in this case being dismissed without further notice. The U.S. Marshal shall serve the summons and complaint upon defendant. (Garland, Leah)
|
|
Filing 3
CIVIL COVER SHEET. (Coyne, Michelle)
|
|
Filing 2
COMPLAINT against S.A. ALVAREZ, J.M. CHAVEZ, CITY OF GREENSBORO, S.K. FLOWERS, K.R. JOHNSON, WAYNE SCOTT, F.T. WRIGHT, filed by ZARED KINAH JONES.(Coyne, Michelle)
|
|
Filing 1
APPLICATION to Proceed IFP by ZARED KINAH JONES. (Coyne, Michelle)
|
|
Motion Referred to Magistrate Judge Joe L. Webster RE: #1 APPLICATION to Proceed IFP. (Coyne, Michelle)
|
|
Case assigned to JUDGE WILLIAM L. OSTEEN, JR and MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER. (Coyne, Michelle)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
