FARMER v. DOE #1 et al
DEE DEIDRE FARMER |
DUKE REGIONAL HOSPITAL and JANE DOE #1 |
1:2019cv01111 |
November 5, 2019 |
US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
LORETTA C BIGGS |
JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Case ASSIGNED to JUDGE LORETTA C. BIGGS and MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE. (Coyne, Michelle) |
CASE REFERRED for Screening. (Coyne, Michelle) |
Filing 4 Case transferred in from District of Maryland; Case Number 1:19-cv-03172. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
Filing 3 ORDER transferring this case to the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina for all further proceedings. Signed by Judge Richard D. Bennett on 11/4/2019. (c/m 11/5/2019)(ko, Deputy Clerk) [Transferred from Maryland on 11/5/2019.] |
Case transferred to District of Middle District of North Carolina. Original file, certified copy of transfer order, and docket sheet sent. (ko, Deputy Clerk) [Transferred from Maryland on 11/5/2019.] |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Dee Deidre Farmer(ko, Deputy Clerk) [Transferred from Maryland on 11/5/2019.] |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Jane Doe #1, Duke Regional Hospital, filed by Dee Deidre Farmer. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(ko, Deputy Clerk) [Transferred from Maryland on 11/5/2019.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.