REINHARDT v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
| WALTER RAY REINHARDT |
| STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA |
| 1:2020cv00013 |
| January 3, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| CATHERINE C EAGLES |
| JOE L WEBSTER |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER AND JUDGMENT signed by JUDGE CATHERINE C. EAGLES on 2/13/2020. The Court adopts the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation and this action is filed and dismissed sua sponte without prejudice to the petitioner filing a new petition, on the proper 2254 forms and accompanied by the $5.00 filing fee or a current application to proceed in forma pauperis, which corrects the defects cited in the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation. A certificate of appealability shall not issue. (Daniel, J)
|
| CASE REFERRED RE: #2 RECOMMENDED RULING - MAGISTRATE JUDGE re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by WALTER RAY REINHARDT to JUDGE CATHERINE C. EAGLES (Sanders, Marlene) |
| Filing 3 Notice of Mailing Recommendation. Objections to R&R due by 1/24/2020. Objections to R&R for Pro Se due by 1/27/2020. (Taylor, Abby) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE signed by MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER on 01/10/2020, that in forma pauperis status is granted for the sole purpose of entering this Order and Recommendation. The Clerk is instructed to send Petitioner 2254 forms, instructions, and a current application to proceed in forma pauperis.RECOMMENDED that this action be construed as a habeas petition under 28 U.S.C. 2254 and dismissed sua sponte without prejudice to Petitioner filing a new petition which corrects the defects of the current Petition. The new petition must be accompanied by either the five dollar filing fee or a current application to proceed in forma pauperis. re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by WALTER RAY REINHARDT. (Taylor, Abby)
|
|
ORDER signed by MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER on 01/10/2020, that in forma pauperis status is granted for the sole purpose of entering this Order and Recommendation. The Clerk is instructed to send Petitioner 2254 forms, instructions, and a current application to proceed in forma pauperis. See #2 RECOMMENDED RULING - MAGISTRATE JUDGE. (Taylor, Abby)
|
| CASE REFERRED for Screening (Taylor, Abby) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by WALTER RAY REINHARDT. (Attachments: #1 Envelope - Front and Back)(Taylor, Abby) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: REINHARDT v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: WALTER RAY REINHARDT | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
