STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. ARLETTA L. WILSON et al
| The Estate of Thornton Wilson by Taylor B. Callicutt, Public Administrator, The State of North Carolina ex rel the Estate of Thornton Wilson by Taylor B. Callicutt, Public Administrator, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and THE ESTATE OF THORNTON WILSON |
| MARKEL CORPORATION, SureTec Insurance Company, Arletta L. Wilson, ALETTA L. WILSON and BARBARA GORE WASHINGTON, ESQ. |
| 1:2020cv00016 |
| January 7, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| WILLIAM L OSTEEN |
| JOE L WEBSTER |
| Personal Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER signed by JUDGE WILLIAM L. OSTEEN, JR on 02/19/2020, that Plaintiffs' Motion to Extend Time to File Motion to Remand, (Doc. #12 ), is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. (Garland, Leah)
|
| Filing 12 MOTION for Extension of Time To File Motion for STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, THE ESTATE OF THORNTON WILSON by STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, THE ESTATE OF THORNTON WILSON. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(DECKER, RACHEL) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney TRISHA L. BARFIELD on behalf of Plaintiffs STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, THE ESTATE OF THORNTON WILSON (BARFIELD, TRISHA) |
| Filing 10 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE by Plaintiffs STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, THE ESTATE OF THORNTON WILSON . (DECKER, RACHEL) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney RACHEL SCOTT DECKER on behalf of Plaintiffs STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, THE ESTATE OF THORNTON WILSON (DECKER, RACHEL) |
| Filing 8 ECF 30 Day Notice as to Attorney TAYLOR B. CALLICUTT. ECF 30 Day Notice due by 2/14/2020. (Sheets, Jamie) |
| Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement by MARKEL CORPORATION. (PRICE, JEFFREY) |
| Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement by SURETEC INSURANCE COMPANY identifying Corporate Parent MARKEL CORPORATION for SURETEC INSURANCE COMPANY.. (PRICE, JEFFREY) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to #2 Complaint, , CROSSCLAIM against ARLETTA L. WILSON by SURETEC INSURANCE COMPANY. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Indemnity Agreement, #2 Exhibit Bond)(PRICE, JEFFREY) |
| Filing 4 Notice of Right to Consent. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form)(Hicks, Samantha) |
| CASE REFERRED to Mediation pursuant to Local Rule 83.9b of the Rules of Practice and Procedure of this Court. Please go to our website under Attorney Information for a list of mediators which must be served on all parties. (Hicks, Samantha) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. Original document filed in Guilford County Superior Court, case number 19CVS10451, and is listed as Exhibit A to the #1 Petition for Removal. (Hicks, Samantha) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, THE ESTATE OF THORNTON WILSON. Original document filed in Guilford County Superior Court, case number 19CVS10451, and is listed as Exhibit A to the #1 Petition for Removal. (Hicks, Samantha) |
| Case ASSIGNED to JUDGE WILLIAM L. OSTEEN, JR and MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER. (Hicks, Samantha) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REMOVAL against STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, THE ESTATE OF THORNTON WILSON (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0418-2726786), filed by MARKEL CORPORATION, SURETEC INSURANCE COMPANY. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Filings)(PRICE, JEFFREY) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
