AZHAR v. DUKE UNIVERSITY
| Dr. Salman Azhar |
| DUKE UNIVERSITY |
| 1:2020cv00187 |
| February 25, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| WILLIAM L OSTEEN |
| JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint,, by DUKE UNIVERSITY. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(GATES, HARRISON) |
ORDER granting #10 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer filed by DUKE UNIVERSITY. Answer due by 5/15/2020. Signed by Gloria L. Powell on 4/24/2020 on behalf of John S. Brubaker, Clerk of Court. (Powell, Gloria)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney AMIE FLOWERS CARMACK on behalf of Defendant DUKE UNIVERSITY (CARMACK, AMIE) |
| Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement by DUKE UNIVERSITY. (GATES, HARRISON) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney HARRISON MANN GATES on behalf of Defendant DUKE UNIVERSITY (GATES, HARRISON) |
| Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE of SUMMONS by SALMAN AZHAR. DUKE UNIVERSITY waiver sent on 2/28/2020, answer due 4/28/2020. (NOBLE, LAURA) |
| Filing 5 Notice of Right to Consent. Counsel shall serve the attached form on all parties. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) (Sheets, Jamie) (Main Document 5 replaced on 2/28/2020) (Sheets, Jamie). |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to DUKE UNIVERSITY. (Sheets, Jamie) |
| Case ASSIGNED to JUDGE WILLIAM L. OSTEEN, JR and MAG/JUDGE JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE. (Sheets, Jamie) |
| CASE REFERRED to Mediation pursuant to Local Rule 83.9b of the Rules of Practice and Procedure of this Court. Please go to our website under Attorney Information for a list of mediators which must be served on all parties. (Sheets, Jamie) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by SALMAN AZHAR. (NOBLE, LAURA) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney LAURA L. NOBLE on behalf of Plaintiff SALMAN AZHAR. (NOBLE, LAURA) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against DUKE UNIVERSITY (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0418-2759502), filed by SALMAN AZHAR. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-2018 04 24 Dukes Offer Letter to Dr. Azhar, #2 Exhibit 2-Dukes Standards of Conduct & Performance/Corrective Action Policy, #3 Exhibit 3-2019 04 23 Email thread with Jon Fjeld, Nicholas Zaldastani, Kate Hendricks Exhibit to, #4 Exhibit 4-2019 04 12 Email from David Frazee to Dr. Azhar, #5 Exhibit 5-Leaving Duke (Voluntary and Involuntary) Policy. (NOBLE, LAURA) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: AZHAR v. DUKE UNIVERSITY | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Dr. Salman Azhar | |
| Represented By: | LAURA L. NOBLE |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: DUKE UNIVERSITY | |
| Represented By: | AMIE FLOWERS CARMACK |
| Represented By: | HARRISON MANN GATES |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
