ALLEN, SR v. DOMINO'S et al
| DERRICK MICHAEL ALLEN, SR |
| JUSTIN KIGER, DOMINO'S and JAMES THOMPSON |
| 1:2020cv00205 |
| March 5, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| L PATRICK AULD |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Motions Referred: RE: #6 Pro Se Motion to File Electronically, to MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD (Garrett, Kim) |
| Filing 6 MOTION Requesting to be Allowed to File Electronically by DERRICK ALLEN, SR. (Attachments: #1 Envelope - Front and Back) (Daniel, J) |
| Filing 5 Notice of Signed Pro Se Electronic Service Consent by DERRICK MICHAEL ALLEN, SR., 78derrickallen@gmail.com. (Attachments: #1 Envelope - Front and Back) (Daniel, J) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Change of Address by DERRICK MICHAEL ALLEN, SR. (Attachments: #1 Envelope - Front and Back) (Sheets, Jamie) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET. (Hicks, Samantha) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by DERRICK MICHAEL ALLEN, SR. (Hicks, Samantha) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION to Proceed IFP by DERRICK MICHAEL ALLEN, SR. (Hicks, Samantha) |
| CASE REFERRED to Standing Order 30. (Hicks, Samantha) |
| Case ASSIGNED to UNASSIGNED and MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD. (Hicks, Samantha) |
| Motions Referred: RE: #1 APPLICATION to Proceed IFP, to MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD. (Hicks, Samantha) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
