FULLARD v. PERRY
Plaintiff: REGINALD FULLARD
Defendant: MS. PERRY
Case Number: 1:2020cv00253
Filed: March 16, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Presiding Judge: LORETTA C BIGGS
Referring Judge: JOE L WEBSTER
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition)
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 7, 2020 Filing 6 JUDGMENT signed by JUDGE LORETTA C. BIGGS on 5/7/2020, that this action is FILED and DISMISSED sua sponte without prejudice to Plaintiff filing a new complaint, on the proper 1983 forms, which corrects the defects cited in the Recommendation if Plaintiff intends to file a case in this District. (Garland, Leah)
May 7, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER signed by JUDGE LORETTA C. BIGGS on 5/7/2020, that this action is FILED and DISMISSED sua sponte without prejudice to Plaintiff filing a new complaint, on the proper 1983 forms, which corrects the defects cited in the Recommendation if Plaintiff intends to file a case in this District. A judgment dismissing this action will be entered contemporaneously with this Order. (Garland, Leah)
May 5, 2020 CASE REFERRED to JUDGE LORETTA C. BIGGS, RE: #2 RECOMMENDED RULING - MAGISTRATE JUDGE. (Blay, Debbie)
April 9, 2020 Filing 4 OBJECTION TO RECOMMENDED RULING - MAGISTRATE JUDGE re #2 Recommended Ruling - Magistrate Judge, by Plaintiff REGINALD FULLARD. (Attachments: #1 Envelope - Front and Back) (Sheets, Jamie)
March 31, 2020 Filing 3 Notice of Mailing Recommendation. Objections to R&R due by 4/14/2020. Objections to R&R for Pro Se due by 4/17/2020. (Hicks, Samantha)
March 31, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE signed by MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER on 03/31/2020; that in forma pauperis status is granted for the sole purpose of entering this Order and Recommendation. The Clerk is instructed to send Plaintiff 1983 forms, instructions, an application to proceed in forma pauperis, and a copy of pertinent parts of Fed. R. Civ. P. 8 (i.e., Sections (a) & (d)). RECOMMENDED that this action be filed and dismissed sua sponte without prejudice to Plaintiff filing a new complaint, on the proper 1983 forms, which corrects the defects cited above if Plaintiff intends to file a case in this District. (Hicks, Samantha)
March 31, 2020 Opinion or Order ORDER signed by MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER on 03/31/2020; that in forma pauperis status is granted for the sole purpose of entering #2 Order and Recommendation. (Hicks, Samantha)
March 17, 2020 Case ASSIGNED to JUDGE LORETTA C. BIGGS and MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER. (Hicks, Samantha)
March 17, 2020 CASE REFERRED for Screening. (Hicks, Samantha)
March 16, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against PERRY filed by REGINALD FULLARD. (Attachments: #1 Envelope - Front and Back) (Hicks, Samantha)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: FULLARD v. PERRY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: REGINALD FULLARD
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MS. PERRY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?