FULLARD v. PERRY
REGINALD FULLARD |
MS. PERRY |
1:2020cv00253 |
March 16, 2020 |
US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
LORETTA C BIGGS |
JOE L WEBSTER |
Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 JUDGMENT signed by JUDGE LORETTA C. BIGGS on 5/7/2020, that this action is FILED and DISMISSED sua sponte without prejudice to Plaintiff filing a new complaint, on the proper 1983 forms, which corrects the defects cited in the Recommendation if Plaintiff intends to file a case in this District. (Garland, Leah) |
Filing 5 ORDER signed by JUDGE LORETTA C. BIGGS on 5/7/2020, that this action is FILED and DISMISSED sua sponte without prejudice to Plaintiff filing a new complaint, on the proper 1983 forms, which corrects the defects cited in the Recommendation if Plaintiff intends to file a case in this District. A judgment dismissing this action will be entered contemporaneously with this Order. (Garland, Leah) |
CASE REFERRED to JUDGE LORETTA C. BIGGS, RE: #2 RECOMMENDED RULING - MAGISTRATE JUDGE. (Blay, Debbie) |
Filing 4 OBJECTION TO RECOMMENDED RULING - MAGISTRATE JUDGE re #2 Recommended Ruling - Magistrate Judge, by Plaintiff REGINALD FULLARD. (Attachments: #1 Envelope - Front and Back) (Sheets, Jamie) |
Filing 3 Notice of Mailing Recommendation. Objections to R&R due by 4/14/2020. Objections to R&R for Pro Se due by 4/17/2020. (Hicks, Samantha) |
Filing 2 ORDER AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE signed by MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER on 03/31/2020; that in forma pauperis status is granted for the sole purpose of entering this Order and Recommendation. The Clerk is instructed to send Plaintiff 1983 forms, instructions, an application to proceed in forma pauperis, and a copy of pertinent parts of Fed. R. Civ. P. 8 (i.e., Sections (a) & (d)). RECOMMENDED that this action be filed and dismissed sua sponte without prejudice to Plaintiff filing a new complaint, on the proper 1983 forms, which corrects the defects cited above if Plaintiff intends to file a case in this District. (Hicks, Samantha) |
ORDER signed by MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER on 03/31/2020; that in forma pauperis status is granted for the sole purpose of entering #2 Order and Recommendation. (Hicks, Samantha) |
Case ASSIGNED to JUDGE LORETTA C. BIGGS and MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER. (Hicks, Samantha) |
CASE REFERRED for Screening. (Hicks, Samantha) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against PERRY filed by REGINALD FULLARD. (Attachments: #1 Envelope - Front and Back) (Hicks, Samantha) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: FULLARD v. PERRY | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: REGINALD FULLARD | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: MS. PERRY | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.