PETERSON v. NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS
| VICTOREA PETERSON |
| NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, DURHAM COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS and ALEJANDRA JAVIERA CABALLERO |
| 1:2020cv00260 |
| March 18, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| THOMAS D SCHROEDER |
| JOE L WEBSTER |
| Civil Rights: Voting |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER signed by MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER on 5/15/2020; that Plaintiff shall have up to and including June 15, 2020 to submit a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis for the Court's consideration. The Clerk shall mail Plaintiff a blank application to proceed in forma pauperis along with this order. (Sheets, Jamie)
|
| Motions Referred to MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER RE: #1 APPLICATION to Proceed IFP. (Sheets, Jamie) |
| Case ASSIGNED to CHIEF JUDGE THOMAS D. SCHROEDER and MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER. (Sheets, Jamie) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET. (Sheets, Jamie) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, DURHAM COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, ALEJANDRA JAVIERA CABALLERO, filed by VICTOREA PETERSON. (Sheets, Jamie) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION to Proceed IFP by VICTOREA PETERSON. (Sheets, Jamie) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
