MAHAN v. WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY, INC
| Mr. Vernon L. Mahan and VERNON L. MAHAN |
| Wright Medical Technology, Inc. and WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY, INC |
| 1:2020cv00482 |
| June 1, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| LORETTA C BIGGS |
| JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against defendant WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY, INC, filed by VERNON L. MAHAN.(OVERHOLT, HUGH) |
| Filing 13 BRIEF re #12 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM . (Attachments: #1 Supplement Unpublished Opinion, #2 Supplement Unpublished Opinion, #3 Supplement Unpublished Opinion, #4 Supplement Unpublished Opinion, #5 Supplement Unpublished Opinion, #6 Supplement Unpublished Opinion, #7 Supplement Unpublished Opinion)(TATE, JILLIANN) |
| Filing 12 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY, INC. Response to Motion due by 7/28/2020 (TATE, JILLIANN) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney DAVID C. VAN DYKE on behalf of Defendant WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY, INC (VAN DYKE, DAVID) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney MICHAEL O. FAWAZ on behalf of Defendant WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY, INC (FAWAZ, MICHAEL) |
| Filing 9 Corporate Disclosure Statement by WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY, INC identifying Corporate Parent Wright Medical Group, Inc., Corporate Parent Wright Medical Group, N.V. for WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY, INC.. (TATE, JILLIANN) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY, INC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A: Plaintiff Counsel Consent to Extension, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(TATE, JILLIANN) |
ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer for WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY, INC. Answer due by 7/7/2020. Signed by John Brubaker, Clerk of Court, on 6/17/2020. (Brubaker, John)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney HARRY LEE DAVIS, JR on behalf of Defendant WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY, INC (DAVIS, HARRY) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney JILLIANN L. TATE on behalf of Defendant WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY, INC (TATE, JILLIANN) |
| Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE as to WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY, INC served on 6/9/2020, answer due 6/30/2020. (OVERHOLT, HUGH) |
| Filing 4 Notice of Right to Consent. Counsel shall serve the attached form on all parties. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) (Sheets, Jamie) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY, INC. (Sheets, Jamie) |
| CASE REFERRED to Mediation pursuant to Local Rule 83.9b of the Rules of Practice and Procedure of this Court. Please go to our website under Attorney Information for a list of mediators which must be served on all parties. (Sheets, Jamie) |
| Filing 2 ***FILED IN ERROR*** COMPLAINT for Damages against WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY, INC, filed by VERNON L. MAHAN. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(OVERHOLT, HUGH) Modified on 6/2/2020 to mark filed in error - duplicate. (Sheets, Jamie) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Damages against WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY, INC (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0418-2815607), filed by VERNON L. MAHAN. (OVERHOLT, HUGH) Modified on 6/2/2020 to add payment information. (Sheets, Jamie) |
| Case ASSIGNED to JUDGE LORETTA C. BIGGS and MAG/JUDGE JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE. (Sheets, Jamie) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
