JACKSON v. SAUL
Case Number: 1:2020cv00592
Filed: July 19, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Office: NCMD Office
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 206 Social Security Benefits

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER signed by JUDGE LORETTA C. BIGGS on 8/19/2021 adopting the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation; that the Acting Commissioner's decision finding no disability is affirmed, that Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, (ECF No. 14 ) is DENIED, that Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is GRANTED, and that this action is DISMISSED with prejudice. A Judgment dismissing this action will be entered contemporaneously with this Order. (Hicks, Samantha)
July 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 18 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE signed by MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD on 07/19/2021, that the Commissioner's decision finding no disability be affirmed, that Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Docket Entry 14 ) be denied, that Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Docket Entry 16 ) be granted, and that judgment be entered dismissing this action. (Garland, Leah)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: JACKSON v. SAUL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?