PINNGAM v. KEARNEY
Plaintiff: PUNCHARUCH PINNGAM
Defendant: MICHAEL KEARNEY
Case Number: 1:2020cv00601
Filed: July 1, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Presiding Judge: JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1346
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 16, 2020 Filing 15 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal of case by Plaintiff PUNCHARUCH PINNGAM (CESANELLI, VALERIA)
July 9, 2020 Case Reported Settled. Stipulation of Dismissal due by 8/10/2020. See #14 Notice of Settlement (Garrett, Kim)
July 8, 2020 Filing 14 NOTICE of Settlement IMPENDING by PUNCHARUCH PINNGAM (CESANELLI, VALERIA)
July 2, 2020 Filing 13 Notice of Right to Consent. Counsel shall serve the attached form on all parties. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) (Sheets, Jamie)
July 2, 2020 Filing 12 Summons Issued as to MICHAEL KEARNEY. (Sheets, Jamie)
July 2, 2020 Filing 11 JOINT STIPULATION Extension of Defendant's Time to Answer Complaint filed by all parties.. (CESANELLI, VALERIA) (Main Document 11 replaced on 7/8/2020) (Sheets, Jamie).
July 2, 2020 Filing 10 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by PUNCHARUCH PINNGAM. MICHAEL KEARNEY waiver sent on 7/1/2020, answer due 8/31/2020. (CESANELLI, VALERIA) (Main Document 10 replaced on 7/2/2020) (Sheets, Jamie).
July 2, 2020 CASE REFERRED to Standing Order 30. (Sheets, Jamie)
July 2, 2020 Case ASSIGNED to UNASSIGNED and MAG/JUDGE JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE. (Sheets, Jamie)
July 1, 2020 Filing 9 Additional Attachments to Main Document re #1 Complaint Ex 8 - I-551_redacted. (CESANELLI, VALERIA)
July 1, 2020 Filing 8 Additional Attachments to Main Document re #1 Complaint Ex 7 - Interview notice. (CESANELLI, VALERIA)
July 1, 2020 Filing 7 Additional Attachments to Main Document re #1 Complaint Ex 6 - RFE re I-864_redacted. (CESANELLI, VALERIA)
July 1, 2020 Filing 6 Additional Attachments to Main Document re #1 Complaint Ex 5 - I-485 NBC worksheet. (CESANELLI, VALERIA)
July 1, 2020 Filing 5 Additional Attachments to Main Document re #1 Complaint Ex 4 - I-485_redacted. (CESANELLI, VALERIA)
July 1, 2020 Filing 4 Additional Attachments to Main Document re #1 Complaint Ex 3 - I-130_redacted. (CESANELLI, VALERIA)
July 1, 2020 Filing 3 Additional Attachments to Main Document re #1 Complaint Ex 2 - Passport with visa foil_redacted. (CESANELLI, VALERIA)
July 1, 2020 Filing 2 Additional Attachments to Main Document re #1 Complaint Ex 1 - I-864 with taxes_redacted. (CESANELLI, VALERIA)
July 1, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against MICHAEL KEARNEY (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0418-2835528), filed by PUNCHARUCH PINNGAM. (CESANELLI, VALERIA) Modified on 7/1/2020 to add payment information. (Sheets, Jamie)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: PINNGAM v. KEARNEY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MICHAEL KEARNEY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: PUNCHARUCH PINNGAM
Represented By: VALERIA CESANELLI
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?