JOINER v. SAPPER
RAYMOND DAKIM HARRIS JOINER |
J. SAPPER |
1:2020cv00754 |
August 19, 2020 |
US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
L PATRICK AULD |
N C TILLEY |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 JUDGMENT signed by JUDGE N. C. TILLEY, JR. on 9/15/2020. For the reasons set forth in the Order filed contemporaneously with this Judgment, the Petition (Doc. #1 ) is dismissed and this action is dismissed. Finding neither a substantial issue for appeal concerning the denial of a constitutional right affecting the conviction nor a debatable procedural ruling, a certificate of appealability is denied. (Daniel, J) |
Filing 5 ORDER signed by JUDGE N. C. TILLEY, JR. on 9/15/2020. The Court adopts the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation and the Petition (Doc. #1 ) is dismissed. A Judgment dismissing this action will be entered contemporaneously with this Order. Finding neither a substantial issue for appeal concerning the denial of a constitutional right affecting the conviction nor a debatable procedural ruling, a certificate of appealability is denied. (Daniel, J) |
CASE REFERRED regarding #2 RECOMMENDED RULING - MAGISTRATE JUDGE to JUDGE N. C. TILLEY, JR. (Winchester, Robin) |
Filing 4 Notice of OBJECTION by Petitioner RAYMOND DAKIM HARRIS JOINER re: #2 MEMORANDUM OPINION, ORDER AND RECOMMENDATAION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. (Attachments: #1 Envelope - Front and Back) (Daniel, J) |
Filing 3 Notice of Mailing Recommendation: Objections to R&R due by 9/14/2020. Objections to R&R for Pro Se due by 9/17/2020. (Garland, Leah) |
Filing 2 MEMORANDUM OPINION, ORDER AND RECOMMENDATAION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE signed by MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD on 8/31/2020, that in forma pauperis status is granted for the sole purpose of entering this Order and Recommendation. RECOMMENDED that the Petition (Docket Entry #1 ) be dismissed. There being no substantial issue for appeal concerning the denial of a constitutional right affecting the conviction nor a debatable procedural ruling, a certificate of appealability should not issue. (Garland, Leah) |
ORDER signed by MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD on 8/31/2020, that in forma pauperis status is granted for the sole purpose of entering this Order and Recommendation. (Garland, Leah) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by RAYMOND DAKIM HARRIS JOINER. (Attachments: #1 Additional attachments, #2 Additional attachments, #3 Envelope - Front and Back)(Taylor, Abby) |
CASE REFERRED for Screening (Taylor, Abby) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: JOINER v. SAPPER | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: J. SAPPER | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: RAYMOND DAKIM HARRIS JOINER | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.