KING v. TARGET CORPORATION et al
BOBBI KING |
KEURIG GREEN MOUNTAIN, INC., TARGET CORPORATION and KEURIG DR PEPPER, INC. |
1:2020cv00802 |
September 2, 2020 |
US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
CATHERINE C EAGLES |
JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 ORDER signed by JUDGE CATHERINE C. EAGLES on 10/29/2020, that the motion to remand, Doc. #11 , is GRANTED and this case is REMANDED to Durham County Superior Court. The defendant Target's motion to change venue, Doc. #8 , is DENIED without prejudice as moot. (Garland, Leah) |
Filing 15 STANDARD ORDER for civil cases proceeding before JUDGE CATHERINE C. EAGLES. (Sanders, Marlene) |
Motions Submitted: #8 MOTION to Change Venue , #11 MOTION to Remand to State Court to JUDGE CATHERINE C. EAGLES. (Sanders, Marlene) |
Case Reassigned to JUDGE CATHERINE C. EAGLES. UNASSIGNED no longer assigned to the case. (Marsh, Keah) |
Filing 14 RESPONSE re #12 Response to Motion, #11 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by KEURIG DR PEPPER, INC., KEURIG GREEN MOUNTAIN, INC.. Replies due by 11/9/2020 (HANLEY, ANDREW) |
Filing 13 Notice to Parties RE: SO30. Responses due by 11/23/2020 (Winchester, Robin) |
Filing 12 RESPONSE filed by Defendant TARGET CORPORATION re #11 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by BOBBI KING filed by TARGET CORPORATION. Replies due by 10/23/2020 (HAMILTON, MEREDITH) |
Filing 11 MOTION to Remand to State Court by BOBBI KING. Response to Motion due by 10/22/2020 (KREGER, THOMAS) |
Filing 10 ANSWER to #2 Complaint with Jury Demand by KEURIG DR PEPPER, INC., KEURIG GREEN MOUNTAIN, INC.. (HANLEY, ANDREW) |
Filing 9 MEMORANDUM filed by Defendant TARGET CORPORATION re #8 MOTION to Change Venue filed by TARGET CORPORATION. (HAMILTON, MEREDITH) |
Filing 8 MOTION to Change Venue by TARGET CORPORATION. Response to Motion due by 9/30/2020 (HAMILTON, MEREDITH) |
Filing 7 ANSWER to #2 Complaint with Jury Demand by TARGET CORPORATION. (HAMILTON, MEREDITH) |
Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement by TARGET CORPORATION. (HAMILTON, MEREDITH) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by attorney SAMUEL H. POOLE, JR on behalf of Defendant TARGET CORPORATION (POOLE, SAMUEL) |
Filing 4 Notice of Right to Consent. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) (Hicks, Samantha) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to KEURIG DR PEPPER, INC., TARGET CORPORATION. (Original document filed in Durham County Superior Court, case number 19-CVS-3393, issued 7/15/2019, and listed as Exhibit 1 to the Petition for Removal) (Hicks, Samantha) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by BOBBI KING. (Original document filed in Durham County Superior Court, case number 19-CVS-3393, and listed as Exhibit 1 to the Petition for Removal) (Hicks, Samantha) |
Filing 1 PETITION FOR REMOVAL against Bobbi King ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0418-2883864.), filed by TARGET CORPORATION. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Summons & Complaint, #2 Exhibit 2 - Notice of Removal (State Court))(HAMILTON, MEREDITH) |
CASE REFERRED to Standing Order 30. (Hicks, Samantha) |
Case ASSIGNED to UNASSIGNED and MAG/JUDGE JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE. (Hicks, Samantha) |
CASE REFERRED to Mediation pursuant to Local Rule 83.9b of the Rules of Practice and Procedure of this Court. Please go to our website under Attorney Information for a list of mediators which must be served on all parties. (Hicks, Samantha) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.