FREEMAN v. SAUL
| HAILEY BROOKE FREEMAN |
| ANDREW SAUL |
| SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION |
| 1:2020cv00880 |
| September 25, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| CATHERINE C EAGLES |
| JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE ON GOVERNMENT on Affidavit of Service as to ANDREW SAUL served on 10/5/2020, answer due 12/4/2020. on Affidavit of Service as to (Attachments: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipts of Summons)(WILSON, JASON) |
| Filing 4 STANDARD ORDER for civil cases proceeding before JUDGE CATHERINE C. EAGLES (Williamson, Wanda) |
| Filing 3 Notice of Right to Consent - SSA. Counsel shall serve the attached form on all parties. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) (Sheets, Jamie) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to ANDREW SAUL, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (Attachments: #1 Summons - U.S. Attorney, #2 Summons - U.S. Attorney General) (Sheets, Jamie) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ANDREW SAUL ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0418-2899714.), filed by HAILEY BROOKE FREEMAN.(WILSON, JASON) |
| Case ASSIGNED to JUDGE CATHERINE C. EAGLES and MAG/JUDGE JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE. (Sheets, Jamie) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
