PARKS v. POOLE et al
Plaintiff: SHAWN DEWAYNE PARKS
Defendant: KATY POOLE and TODD E. ISHEE
Case Number: 1:2020cv00898
Filed: October 1, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Presiding Judge: WILLIAM L OSTEEN
Referring Judge: JOE L WEBSTER
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition)
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 17, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Notice of Right to Consent. U.S. Marshal shall serve the attached form on all parties. (Attachments: #1 Consent form)(Taylor, Abby)
November 17, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Summons Issued as to TODD E. ISHEE, KATY POOLE. (Taylor, Abby) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/17/2020: #1 Envelope) (Taylor, Abby).
November 4, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER signed by MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER on 11/04/2020, that the Clerk shall send Plaintiff a summons for each defendant named in the complaint. Plaintiff must fill out a summons for each defendant, including an address suitable for service, and then return the summons(es) to the Clerk. Failure to provide an address wherein service may be made on any defendant will result in the dismissal of the action as to all such unserved defendants after 90 days from the filing of the complaint. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). FURTHER ORDERED that the United States Marshal shall serve the complaint (Docket Entries 2, 4) on the defendant(s).(Taylor, Abby)
October 30, 2020 Opinion or Order CASE REFERRED RE: Receipt of Funds, to MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER (Taylor, Abby)
October 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Receipt of Funds for initial filing fee in the amount of $ 8.33. Receipt Number: NCM052244. (Sheets, Jamie)
October 19, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 SUPPORTING MEMORANDUM to #2 Complaint, filed by Plaintiff SHAWN DEWAYNE PARKS. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Envelope - Front and Back) (Garland, Leah)
October 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER signed by MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER on 10/14/2020, that Plaintiff in the above-named action be, and is hereby, permitted to file and prosecute said action in this Court without prepayment of fees or giving security therefor, subject to the conditions set forth below. FURTHER ORDERED that, as a condition of Plaintiff's proceeding in forma pauperis, Plaintiff shall, within sixty (60) days after the date of this Order, submit to the Clerk an initial payment of $8.33 (which represents 20% of the greater of the average monthly deposits into or the balance in Plaintiff's account for the 6-month period immediately preceding filing of this complaint). FURTHER ORDERED that, as a condition of Plaintiff's proceeding in forma pauperis, Plaintiff's trust officer shall be directed to pay to the Clerk of this Court 20% of all deposits to his account starting with the month of December of 2020, and thereafter each time that the amount in the account exceeds $10.00 until the $350.00 filing fee has been paid. FURTHER ORDERED that all payments deducted in relation to this case shall be designated as made in payment of the filing fee for Civil Action No. 1:20CV898, and shall be paid to the Clerk, U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina. In the event Plaintiff is transferred to another institution, the balance due shall be collected and paid to the Clerk by the custodian at Plaintiff's next institution. A copy of this Order shall be sent to Plaintiff's current custodian. FURTHER ORDERED that this action be filed, but that further proceedings and service of summons be stayed until Plaintiff has either (1) submitted to the Court the initial payment noted above, or (2) in the alternative has submitted a motion for relief from the stay, and a statement made under penalty of perjury that he has not had access to any funds for the initial payment noted above for the 60-day period. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER IN A TIMELY MANNER WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THIS ACTION WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF. (Garland, Leah)
October 1, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 COMPLAINT against TODD E. ISHEE, KATY POOLE, filed by SHAWN DEWAYNE PARKS. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope - Front and Back) (Hicks, Samantha)
October 1, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 APPLICATION to Proceed IFP by SHAWN DEWAYNE PARKS. (Hicks, Samantha)
October 1, 2020 Opinion or Order CASE REFERRED for Screening. (Hicks, Samantha)
October 1, 2020 Opinion or Order Case ASSIGNED to JUDGE WILLIAM L. OSTEEN, JR and MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER. (Hicks, Samantha)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: PARKS v. POOLE et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: SHAWN DEWAYNE PARKS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: KATY POOLE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: TODD E. ISHEE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?