MOOSE v. SOUTHERN FARM BUREAU LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
BARRY MOOSE |
SOUTHERN FARM BUREAU LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY |
1:2020cv01118 |
December 11, 2020 |
US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
L PATRICK AULD |
CATHERINE C EAGLES |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
TEXT ORDER adopting #13 Joint Report for the Filing of Sealed Documents. Issued by MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD on 01/25/2021. (AULD, L.) |
Motions Referred: RE: #13 L.R. 5.5 Report-Joint filed by all parties to MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD. (Sanders, Marlene) |
Filing 13 L.R. 5.5 Report-Joint filed by all parties by BARRY MOOSE. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Rule 5.5 Order)(QUINN, NANCY) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by attorney NIA K. DOAKS on behalf of Defendant SOUTHERN FARM BUREAU LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY (DOAKS, NIA) |
Filing 11 ORDER Appointing M. ANN ANDERSON, as the Mediator pursuant to LR 83.9d(a). Signed by John S. Brubaker, Clerk of Court. (Kemp, Donita) |
Set/Reset Scheduling Order Deadlines: The parties propose the appropriate plan for this case is that designated in L.R. 26.1(a) as Standard. The parties propose Ann Anderson serve as the mediator for this case. Plaintiff's Amended Pleadings due by 2/3/2021. Defendant's Amended Pleadings due by 2/17/2021. Discovery due by 5/7/2021. Joinder of Parties for Plaintiff due by 2/3/2021. Joinder of Parties for Defendant due by 2/17/2021. The parties do not consent to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. A jury trial has been demanded. If the case is ultimately tried, trial is expected to take approximately three days. (Taylor, Abby) |
MEDIATION SCHEDULING ORDER; Mediation due by 5/7/2021.(Kemp, Donita) |
TEXT ORDER adopting #10 Joint Rule 26(f) Report with the following clarification: in light of the information in Paragraph 4(d) the parties must file a Local Rule 5.5 Report by 01/22/2021. Issued by MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD on 01/15/2021. (AULD, L.) |
Motions Referred: RE: #10 Rule 26(f) Report (Joint) filed by all parties, to MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD (Garrett, Kim) |
Filing 10 Rule 26(f) Report (Joint) filed by all parties by SOUTHERN FARM BUREAU LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY.(CEGLOWSKI, KEVIN) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Initial Pretrial Conference Hearing: Initial Pretrial Conference Hearing set for 1/25/2021 09:30 AM in Greensboro Courtroom #1A before MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD. (Williamson, Wanda) |
Filing 8 STANDARD ORDER for civil cases proceeding before JUDGE CATHERINE C. EAGLES. (Sanders, Marlene) |
Filing 7 ANSWER to #2 Complaint by SOUTHERN FARM BUREAU LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY. (CEGLOWSKI, KEVIN) |
Case ASSIGNED to JUDGE CATHERINE C. EAGLES and MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD. (Hicks, Samantha) |
Filing 6 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed pursuant to FRCP 7.1(a) by Defendant SOUTHERN FARM BUREAU LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY by SOUTHERN FARM BUREAU LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY.(CEGLOWSKI, KEVIN) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by attorney KEVIN MICHAEL CEGLOWSKI on behalf of Defendant SOUTHERN FARM BUREAU LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY (CEGLOWSKI, KEVIN) |
Filing 4 Notice of Right to Consent. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) (Sheets, Jamie) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to SOUTHERN FARM BUREAU LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY. (Original filed in Guilford County Superior Court, case number 20CVS8100, issued 11/4/2020 and listed as Attachment 2 to the Petition for Removal) (Sheets, Jamie) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT against SOUTHERN FARM BUREAU LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, filed by BARRY MOOSE. (Original filed in Guilford County Superior Court, case number 20CVS8100, and listed as Attachment 1 to the Petition for Removal) (Sheets, Jamie) |
Filing 1 PETITION FOR REMOVAL against BARRY MOOSE ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0418-2948556.), filed by SOUTHERN FARM BUREAU LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY. (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1 - Complaint and the proof of service occurring on November 12, 2020, #2 Attachment 2 - Civil Summons, #3 Attachment 3 - Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Attachment 4 - Notice to State Court of Removal to Federal Court (without attachments), #5 Attachment 5 - Notice of Removal to Adverse Party (without attachments))(CEGLOWSKI, KEVIN) |
CASE REFERRED to Mediation pursuant to Local Rule 83.9b of the Rules of Practice and Procedure of this Court. Please go to our website under Attorney Information for a list of mediators which must be served on all parties. (Sheets, Jamie) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: MOOSE v. SOUTHERN FARM BUREAU LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: SOUTHERN FARM BUREAU LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY | |
Represented By: | KEVIN MICHAEL CEGLOWSKI |
Represented By: | NIA K. DOAKS |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: BARRY MOOSE | |
Represented By: | NANCY PULLIAM QUINN |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.