BECTON, DICKINSON AND COMPANY v. OMNICELL, INC., et al
| BECTON, DICKINSON AND COMPANY |
| JOHN DOES 1-10, OMNICELL, INC. and ABC Entities 1-10 |
| 1:2020cv01144 |
| December 21, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| LORETTA C BIGGS |
| JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by attorney MICHAEL T. MEDFORD on behalf of Defendant OMNICELL, INC. (MEDFORD, MICHAEL) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by attorney WILLIAM SUTTON CHERRY, III on behalf of Defendant OMNICELL, INC. (CHERRY, WILLIAM) |
| Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed pursuant to FRCP 7.1(a) by Plaintiff BECTON DICKINSON AND COMPANY (STAFFORD, MARK) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0418-2953319.)(Related Case # 20-cv-725), filed by BECTON DICKINSON AND COMPANY.(STAFFORD, MARK) |
| Case ASSIGNED to JUDGE LORETTA C. BIGGS and MAG/JUDGE JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE. (Sheets, Jamie) |
| CASE REFERRED to Mediation pursuant to Local Rule 83.9b of the Rules of Practice and Procedure of this Court. Please go to our website under Attorney Information for a list of mediators which must be served on all parties. (Sheets, Jamie) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
