JOHNSON v. CONCORD MAIN POST OFFICE
| OBADIAH JOHNSON |
| CONCORD MAIN POST OFFICE |
| 1:2021cv00077 |
| January 27, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| L PATRICK AULD |
| CATHERINE C EAGLES |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 24, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Roseboro Letter as to Plaintiff OBADIAH JOHNSON. #8 MOTION to Dismiss or In the Alternative Motion for Summary Judgment by CONCORD MAIN POST OFFICE. (Taylor, Abby) |
| Filing 9 MEMORANDUM re #8 MOTION to Dismiss or In the Alternative Motion for Summary Judgment by Defendant CONCORD MAIN POST OFFICE. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Declaration of Kimberly A. Herbst)(CHILDS, JOAN) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss or In the Alternative Motion for Summary Judgment by CONCORD MAIN POST OFFICE. Response to Motion due by 3/22/2021 (CHILDS, JOAN) |
| Filing 7 STANDARD ORDER for civil cases proceeding before JUDGE CATHERINE C. EAGLES. (Sanders, Marlene) |
| Motions Referred: RE: #3 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD (Sanders, Marlene) |
| TEXT ORDER granting #3 Motion for Extension of Time. Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond by 03/01/2021. Issued by MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD on 01/28/2021. (AULD, L.) |
| Filing 6 Notice of Right to Consent. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) (Hicks, Samantha) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to CONCORD MAIN POST OFFICE. (Originally filed in Cabarrus County District Court - Small Claims, case number 21CVM69, issued 1/13/2021, and is listed as Exhibit A to the #1 Petition for Removal.) (Hicks, Samantha) |
| Filing 4 COMPLAINT against CONCORD MAIN POST OFFICE, filed by OBADIAH JOHNSON. (Originally filed in Cabarrus County District Court - Small Claims, case number 21CVM69, and is listed as Exhibit A to the #1 Petition for Removal.) (Hicks, Samantha) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Concord Main Post Office. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(CHILDS, JOAN) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE to State Court of Filing Petition for Removal by Defendant Concord Main Post Office (CHILDS, JOAN) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REMOVAL against Obadiah Johnson, filed by Concord Main Post Office. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Summons and Complaint)(CHILDS, JOAN) |
| Case ASSIGNED to JUDGE CATHERINE C. EAGLES and MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD. (Hicks, Samantha) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: JOHNSON v. CONCORD MAIN POST OFFICE | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: CONCORD MAIN POST OFFICE | |
| Represented By: | JOAN BRODISH CHILDS |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: OBADIAH JOHNSON | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
