GAMBOUR v. ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES et al
ARNJAD AHMED MOHAMED KHAIR GAMBOUR and AMJAD AHMED MOHAMED KHAIR GAMBOUR |
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES and ANDREW SAUL |
1:2021cv00292 |
April 8, 2021 |
US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
WILLIAM L OSTEEN |
JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE ON GOVERNMENT as to ANDREW SAUL served on 4/13/2021, answer due 6/14/2021. (Garland, Leah) |
Filing 5 Notice of Right to Consent - SSA. Plaintiff shall serve the attached form on all parties. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) (Sheets, Jamie) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to ANDREW SAUL, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (Sheets, Jamie) |
Filing 3 AMENDED COMPLAINT against defendant ANDREW SAUL, filed by ARNJAD AHMED MOHAMED KHAIR GAMBOUR. (Sheets, Jamie) |
Case ASSIGNED to JUDGE WILLIAM L. OSTEEN, JR and MAG/JUDGE JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE. (Sheets, Jamie) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET. (Sheets, Jamie) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, filed by ARNJAD AHMED MOHAMED KHAIR GAMBOUR. (Sheets, Jamie) |
Receipt of Funds in the amount of $ 402.00. Receipt Number NCM053882. (Sheets, Jamie) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.