ALLEN v. BUCHMAN et al
| DERRICK ALLEN |
| GUATAM PATANKAR, GRETA VANDERLOOP, CHAD PISANESCHI, CHAD BUCHMAN and SUZANNE GUINN |
| 1:2021cv00295 |
| April 7, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| L PATRICK AULD |
| THOMAS D SCHROEDER |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Assembled Electronic Record Transmitted to Fourth Circuit US Court of Appeals re: #9 Notice of Appeal Without Fee Payment. USCA Case #21-1562. (Daniel, J) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Docketing Appeal from USCA re: #9 Notice of Appeal Without Fee Payment filed by DERRICK ALLEN. USCA Case Mgr: Ashley Brownlee; USCA Case Number 21-1562. (Daniel, J) |
| Filing 10 Electronic Transmission of Notice of Appeal and Docket Sheet to US Court of Appeals re: #9 Notice of Appeal Without Fee Payment. (Daniel, J) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEAL Without Fee Payment by DERRICK ALLEN re: #8 Judgment. (Attachments: #1 Envelope - Front and Back) (Daniel, J) |
| Filing 8 JUDGMENT signed by CHIEF JUDGE THOMAS D. SCHROEDER on 5/3/2021. For the reasons set forth in the Order filed contemporaneously with this Judgment, this action is dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B). (Daniel, J) |
Filing 7
ORDER signed by CHIEF JUDGE THOMAS D. SCHROEDER on 5/3/2021. The court adopts the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation and this action is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B). (Daniel, J)
|
| CASE REFERRED to CHIEF JUDGE THOMAS D. SCHROEDER RE: RECOMMENDED RULING by MAGISTRATE JUDGE. (Engle, Anita) |
| Filing 6 OBJECTION by Plaintiff DERRICK ALLEN to 4/23/2021 TEXT ORDER AND RECOMMENDATION. (Attachments: #1 Envelope - Front and Back) (Daniel, J) |
| CASE REFERRED to MAGISTRATE JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD RE: RECOMMENDED RULING BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE. (Engle, Anita) |
| Filing 5 Notice of Mailing Text Order and Recommendation. Objections due by 5/7/2021. Objections for Pro Se due by 5/10/2021. (Daniel, J) |
| TEXT ORDER terminating #1 Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs, in light of the recommendation of dismissal of this action. Issued by MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD on 04/23/2021. (AULD, L.) |
| TEXT ORDER AND RECOMMENDATION granting #1 Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs for the limited purpose of (B) recommending dismissal of this action under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2) as frivolous and for failure to state a claim. As to that recommendation, #2 Complaint contains manifestly insufficient factual matter to support its conclusory assertions that Defendants discriminated and/or retaliated against Plaintiff in violation of Title VII, the ADEA, and/or Section 1981. Issued by MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD on 04/23/2021. (AULD, L.) |
| Motions Referred: RE: #1 APPLICATION to Proceed IFP to MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD. (Powell, Gloria) |
| Case ASSIGNED to CHIEF JUDGE THOMAS D. SCHROEDER and MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD. (Hicks, Samantha) |
| Filing 4 Notice of Signed Pro Se Electronic Service Consent by DERRICK ALLEN 78derrickallen@gmail.com. (Hicks, Samantha) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET. (Hicks, Samantha) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by DERRICK ALLEN. (Attachments: #1 Envelope - Front and Back) (Hicks, Samantha) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION to Proceed IFP by DERRICK ALLEN. (Hicks, Samantha) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
