CUSH-EL v. STATE OF MISSOURI INC. et al
PEACE ELLUVASUN ALLAH CUSH-EL |
AGENT MICHAEL L. PARSON, AGENT JOHN MARINER KEMPER, STATE OF MISSOURI INC., AGENT ERIC SCHMITT, AGENT WILLIAM BARR, AGENT WESLEY BELL and AGENT STACY CUNNINGHAM |
1:2021cv00337 |
April 28, 2021 |
US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
L PATRICK AULD |
THOMAS D SCHROEDER |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. § 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 JUDGMENT signed by CHIEF JUDGE THOMAS D. SCHROEDER on 05/19/2021, that this action is filed and dismissed sua sponte without prejudice to Plaintiff filing a new action, on the proper forms and in a proper district, which corrects the defects of the current complaint and is accompanied by the applicable $402.00 filing fee. (Taylor, Abby) |
Filing 9 ORDER signed by CHIEF JUDGE THOMAS D. SCHROEDER on 05/19/2021, that this action is filed and dismissed sua sponte without prejudice to Plaintiff filing a new action, on the proper forms and in a proper district, which corrects the defects of the current complaint and is accompanied by the applicable $402.00 filing fee.(Taylor, Abby) |
Motions Submitted to CHIEF JUDGE THOMAS D. SCHROEDER: #6 MOTION to Amend #2 Complaint, #4 RECOMMENDED RULING by MAGISTRATE JUDGE re #2 Complaint, filed by PEACE ELLUVASUN ALLAH CUSH-EL. (Engle, Anita) |
Motions Referred to MAGISTRATE JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD RE: #6 MOTION to Amend #2 Complaint #4 RECOMMENDED RULING by MAGISTRATE JUDGE re #2 Complaint. (Engle, Anita) |
Filing 8 OBJECTION TO RECOMMENDED RULING - MAGISTRATE JUDGE re #4 Recommended Ruling - Magistrate Judge, by Plaintiff PEACE ELLUVASUN ALLAH CUSH-EL. Response to Objections to R&R due by 6/1/2021 (Taylor, Abby) |
Filing 7 MEMORANDUM re #6 MOTION to Amend #2 Complaint, by Plaintiff PEACE ELLUVASUN ALLAH CUSH-EL. (Taylor, Abby) |
Filing 6 MOTION to Amend #2 Complaint, by PEACE ELLUVASUN ALLAH CUSH-EL. Response to Motion due by 6/07/2021 (Attachments: #1 Envelope - Front and Back)(Taylor, Abby) |
Filing 5 Notice of Mailing Recommendation. Objections to R&R due by 5/14/2021. Objections to R&R for Pro Se due by 5/17/2021. (Hicks, Samantha) |
Filing 4 ORDER AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE signed by MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD on 4/29/2021; ORDERED that in forma pauperis status is granted for the sole purpose of entering this Order and Recommendation. RECOMMENDED that this action be filed and dismissed sua sponte without prejudice to Plaintiff filing a new action, on the proper forms and in a proper district, which corrects the defects cited above and is accompanied by the applicable $402.00 filing fee. (Hicks, Samantha) |
ORDER granting #1 Motion for Application to Proceed IFP. Signed by MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD on 4/29/2021. (Hicks, Samantha) |
Filing 3 MOTION entitled "Notice of Omnibus Motion" by PEACE ELLUVASUN ALLAH CUSH-EL. Response to Motion due by 5/24/2021. (Hicks, Samantha) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by PEACE ELLUVASUN ALLAH CUSH-EL. (Attachments: #1 Contents, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit A1, #4 Exhibit A2, #5 Exhibit A3, #6 Exhibit A3, #7 Exhibit A4, #8 Exhibit A5, #9 Discovery Demand) (Hicks, Samantha) |
Filing 1 APPLICATION to Proceed IFP by PEACE ELLUVASUN ALLAH CUSH-EL. (Hicks, Samantha) |
CASE REFERRED for Screening. (Hicks, Samantha) |
Case ASSIGNED to CHIEF JUDGE THOMAS D. SCHROEDER and MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD. (Hicks, Samantha) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.