DIGGS v. CITIZENS ONE AUTO FINANCE
| JAVIER A. DIGGS |
| CITIZENS ONE AUTO FINANCE |
| 1:2021cv00398 |
| May 19, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| LORETTA C BIGGS |
| JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE |
| Assault Libel & Slander |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Envelope Containing #4 Order and Pro Se Civil Complaint addressed to Javier A. Diggs, 4 River Oaks Dr., Apt. A, Greensboro, NC 27409 returned to the Court by the US Postal Service because Not Deliverable As Addressed - Return To Sender. (Daniel, J) |
Filing 4
ORDER signed by MAG/JUDGE JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE on 5/24/2021; that Plaintiff's Application for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and Affidavit/Declaration in Support [Doc. #1 ] is GRANTED to the extent set out above, and Plaintiff is hereby permitted to proceed in this action in forma pauperis, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a). As a condition of further proceeding Plaintiff must, within 30 days from the date of this Order, pay $27.00 to the Clerk toward the filing fee or this action will be dismissed without further notice to him. Plaintiff shall make additional monthly payments of $25.00 every month thereafter until the $402.00 filing fee is paid or this action will be dismissed without further notice to him. FURTHER that proceedings in this this case are STAYED for 30 days, to allow Plaintiff the opportunity to submit his claims on the proper forms. Failure to submit the proper forms will result in the case being dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk is directed to send to Plaintiff the Pro Se Complaint for Civil Case forms. If Plaintiff submits his claims on the proper forms, the case should be referred back to the Court for further review to determine whether the case should proceed. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER IN A TIMELY MANNER WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THIS ACTION WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF. (Sheets, Jamie)
|
| Motion Referred: RE: #1 APPLICATION to Proceed IFP to MAG/JUDGE JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE. (Hicks, Samantha) |
| Case ASSIGNED to JUDGE LORETTA C. BIGGS and MAG/JUDGE JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE. (Hicks, Samantha) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET. (Hicks, Samantha) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against CITIZENS ONE AUTO FINANCE, filed by JAVIER A. DIGGS. (Attachments: #1 Envelope - Front and Back) (Hicks, Samantha) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION to Proceed IFP by JAVIER A. DIGGS. (Hicks, Samantha) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: DIGGS v. CITIZENS ONE AUTO FINANCE | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: JAVIER A. DIGGS | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: CITIZENS ONE AUTO FINANCE | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
