MCGRAYNE v. TOWN OF CARTHAGE et al
| JEANNE MCGRAYNE |
| WILKES GRADING, ALLIANCE CODE ENFORCEMENT and TOWN OF CARTHAGE |
| 1:2021cv00455 |
| June 4, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| L PATRICK AULD |
| WILLIAM L OSTEEN |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Corporate Disclosure Statement by ALLIANCE CODE ENFORCEMENT. (DERRENBACHER, CHRISTOPHER) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by attorney CHRISTOPHER J. DERRENBACHER on behalf of Defendant ALLIANCE CODE ENFORCEMENT (DERRENBACHER, CHRISTOPHER) |
| Filing 10 ANSWER to #5 Complaint with Jury Demand by ALLIANCE CODE ENFORCEMENT. (DERRENBACHER, CHRISTOPHER) |
| Filing 9 ANSWER to #5 Complaint with Jury Demand by TOWN OF CARTHAGE. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6)(BARBER-JONES, KATHERINE) |
| TEXT ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer filed by ALLIANCE CODE ENFORCEMENT. Defendant Alliance Code Enforcement shall file an answer or other responsive pleading in response to Plaintiff's Complaint no later than July 17, 2021. Issued by MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER on 6/23/2021.(Lee, Pedra) |
| Filing 8 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #5 Complaint by ALLIANCE CODE ENFORCEMENT. (FLANAGAN, PATRICK) |
| Motion Referred re: #8 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #5 Complaint, to MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER. (Welch, Kelly) |
ORDER granting #4 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer filed by TOWN OF CARTHAGE to 7/12/2021. Answer due by 7/12/2021. Signed by John Brubaker, Clerk of Court, on 6/7/2021. (Brubaker, John)
|
| Filing 7 Notice of Right to Consent. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) (Sheets, Jamie) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to ALLIANCE CODE ENFORCEMENT, TOWN OF CARTHAGE. (Originally filed in Moore County Superior Court, file number 21-CVS-599, issued 4/30/2021 and listed as Exhibit A to the Petition for Removal) (Sheets, Jamie) |
| Filing 5 COMPLAINT against TOWN OF CARTHAGE, ALLIANCE CODE ENFORCEMENT, WILKES GRADING, filed by JEANNE MCGRAYNE. (Originally filed in Moore County Superior Court, file number 21-CVS-599, and listed as Exhibit A to the Petition for Removal) (Sheets, Jamie) |
| Filing 4 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Petition for Removal, by TOWN OF CARTHAGE. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(BARBER-JONES, KATHERINE) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by attorney KATHERINE MARIE BARBER-JONES on behalf of Defendant TOWN OF CARTHAGE (BARBER-JONES, KATHERINE) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by attorney DAN MCCORD HARTZOG, JR on behalf of Defendant TOWN OF CARTHAGE (HARTZOG, DAN) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REMOVAL against All Plaintiffs (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0418-3061743), filed by TOWN OF CARTHAGE. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Superior Court File, #2 Exhibit B - Notice of Removal to Federal Court) (BARBER-JONES, KATHERINE) |
| Case ASSIGNED to JUDGE WILLIAM L. OSTEEN, JR and MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD. (Sheets, Jamie) |
| CASE REFERRED to Mediation pursuant to Local Rule 83.9b of the Rules of Practice and Procedure of this Court. Please go to our website under Attorney Information for a list of mediators which must be served on all parties. (Sheets, Jamie) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
