EVANS et al v. CLIENT SERVICES, INC.
| TONYA ALLISON and MARGARET EVANS |
| CLIENT SERVICES, INC. |
| 1:2021cv00477 |
| June 11, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| L PATRICK AULD |
| LORETTA C BIGGS |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by attorney S. MICHAEL DUNN on behalf of Plaintiffs TONYA ALLISON, MARGARET EVANS (DUNN, S.) |
| Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by MARGARET EVANS, TONYA ALLISON. CLIENT SERVICES, INC. waiver sent on 6/11/2021, answer due 8/10/2021. (HARRIS, SCOTT) |
| Filing 5 Notice of Right to Consent. Counsel shall serve the attached form on all parties. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) (Hicks, Samantha) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to CLIENT SERVICES, INC. (Hicks, Samantha) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by TONYA ALLISON. (HARRIS, SCOTT) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by MARGARET EVANS. (HARRIS, SCOTT) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CLIENT SERVICES, INC. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0418-3066490.), filed by MARGARET EVANS, TONYA ALLISON. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(HARRIS, SCOTT) |
| Case ASSIGNED to JUDGE LORETTA C. BIGGS and MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD. (Hicks, Samantha) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
