BRAUN v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEAN MICHAEL BRAUN |
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA |
1:2021cv00638 |
August 13, 2021 |
US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
L PATRICK AULD |
THOMAS D SCHROEDER |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 Roseboro Letter as to Petitioner DEAN MICHAEL BRAUN. Re #7 MOTION to Dismiss on Statute of Limitations Grounds by STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA (Taylor, Abby) |
Filing 8 Supporting BRIEF re #7 MOTION to Dismiss on Statute of Limitations Grounds, #6 Response to Habeas Petition by Respondent STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA filed by STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA. (Attachments: #1 Detailed List of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit 1. Transcript of Plea, #3 Exhibit 2. Judgment and Commitment, #4 Exhibit 3. 27 December 2005 Letter re: Absence of Right to Appeal, #5 Exhibit 4. 6 June 2014 pro se Motion for Appropriate Relief (MAR1), #6 Exhibit 5. 13 June 2014 Judge Roysters Order Denying MAR1, #7 Exhibit 6. 6 April 2021- pro se Motion for Appropriate Relief (MAR2), #8 Exhibit 7. 8 April 2021 Judge Klasss Order Denying MAR2, #9 Exhibit 8. Search Warrant)(JENSEN, MARISSA) |
Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss on Statute of Limitations Grounds by STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA. Response to Motion due by 10/15/2021 (JENSEN, MARISSA) |
Filing 6 Answer RESPONSE to #2 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA. (JENSEN, MARISSA) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL AND SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL on behalf of Respondent STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA. MARISSA K. JENSEN is substituted as counsel for Respondent. Attorney PHILLIP A. RUBIN terminated. (JENSEN, MARISSA) |
Filing 4 ORDER REQUIRING ANSWER FROM RESPONDENT signed by MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD on 08/17/2021, that Petitioner's Motion (Docket Entry #3 ) seeking an appointment of counsel is denied. FURTHER that Petitioner's request to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. Respondent shall file an answer with this Court, pursuant to Rules 4 and 5, Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, within 40 days of the issue of this Order. (Taylor, Abby) |
Set Answer Deadline: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA answer due 9/26/2021. (Taylor, Abby) |
Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by DEAN MICHAEL BRAUN. (Taylor, Abby) |
Filing 2 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by DEAN MICHAEL BRAUN.(Taylor, Abby) |
Filing 1 APPLICATION to Proceed IFP by DEAN MICHAEL BRAUN. (Attachments: #1 Envelope - Front and Back)(Taylor, Abby) |
CASE REFERRED for Screening (Taylor, Abby) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: BRAUN v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: DEAN MICHAEL BRAUN | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA | |
Represented By: | MARISSA K. JENSEN |
Represented By: | PHILLIP A. RUBIN |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.