KARZO v. MATADOR RECORDS, INC., et al
| MOHAMED ALASSANE KARZO |
| MATADOR RECORDS, INC., DOMINO PUBLISHING COMPANY OF AMERICA, INC., REDEYE, INC., M'DOU MOCTAR, MAHAMADOU SOULEYMANE, MICHAEL COLTUN, AHMOUDOU MADASSANE, IBRAHIM SOULEYMANE and SOULEYMANE IBRAHIM |
| 1:2021cv00667 |
| August 29, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| L PATRICK AULD |
| LORETTA C BIGGS |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by REDEYE, INC.. (HYLARIDES, DONAVAN)
|
|
Filing 11
CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed pursuant to FRCP 7.1(a) by Defendant REDEYE, INC.. (HYLARIDES, DONAVAN)
|
|
Filing 10
NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by attorney DONAVAN J. HYLARIDES on behalf of Defendant REDEYE, INC. (HYLARIDES, DONAVAN)
|
|
Filing 9
WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by MOHAMED ALASSANE KARZO. DOMINO PUBLISHING COMPANY OF AMERICA, INC. waiver sent on 10/5/2021, answer due 12/6/2021. (PERRY, MICHEAL)
|
|
Filing 8
ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by MICHAEL COLTUN, SOULEYMANE IBRAHIM, AHMOUDOU MADASSANE, M'DOU MOCTAR, MAHAMADOU SOULEYMANE. (HYLARIDES, DONAVAN)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by attorney DONAVAN J. HYLARIDES on behalf of Defendants MICHAEL COLTUN, SOULEYMANE IBRAHIM, AHMOUDOU MADASSANE, M'DOU MOCTAR, MAHAMADOU SOULEYMANE (HYLARIDES, DONAVAN)
|
|
Filing 6
Notice of Right to Consent. Counsel shall serve the attached form on all parties. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) (Sheets, Jamie)
|
|
Filing 5
Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Summons - Domino Publishing Company of America, Inc., #2 Summons - Redeye, Inc., #3 Summons - M'Dou Moctar, #4 Summons - Mahamadou Souleymane, #5 Summons - Michael Coltun, #6 Summons - Ahmoudour Madassane, #7 Summons - Souleymane Ibrahim) (Sheets, Jamie)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS signed by MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD on 9/2/2021; that the plaintiff in the above-entitled proceeding be, and is hereby, permitted to commence said proceeding in this Court without prepayment of fees or costs, or giving security therefor. [28 U.S.C. 1915(a)] Plaintiff is responsible for preparing and delivering to the Clerk, the correct summons for service on each defendant, including the correct address and the name and title of the individual to be served on behalf of a corporation, association, infant, incompetent or government agency. Failure to prepare and deliver said summons within 15 days from the filing of this order shall result in this case being dismissed without further notice. Plaintiff is responsible for service of the complaint and summons upon the defendant. (Sheets, Jamie)
|
|
Motions Referred to MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD RE: #2 APPLICATION to Proceed IFP. (Sheets, Jamie)
|
|
Filing 2
APPLICATION to Proceed IFP () by MOHAMED ALASSANE KARZO. (PERRY, MICHEAL)
|
|
CASE REFERRED to Mediation pursuant to Local Rule 83.9b of the Rules of Practice and Procedure of this Court. Please go to our website under Attorney Information for a list of mediators which must be served on all parties. (Sheets, Jamie)
|
|
Case ASSIGNED to JUDGE LORETTA C. BIGGS and MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD. (Sheets, Jamie)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by MOHAMED ALASSANE KARZO. (PERRY, MICHEAL)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
