ESSICK v. SIMMONS et al
ANTHONY MARK ESSICK |
LT. CARLOS SIMMONS, CLAUDE JARMAN, S. STEPHEN, NURSE DAVIS and NURSE BUNN |
1:2021cv00812 |
October 15, 2021 |
US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
L PATRICK AULD |
LORETTA C BIGGS |
Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Envelope Containing #3 Order returned to court by postal service, marked undeliverable because Released 10/19/21, addressed to ANTHONY MARK ESSICK,0639310,PENDER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION,P.O. BOX 1058,BURGAW, NC 28425. (Butler, Carol) |
Filing 4 Transfer Letter; Case transferred to the Eastern District of North Carolina. (Hicks, Samantha) |
Filing 3 ORDER signed by MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD on 10/20/2021; that in forma pauperis status is granted for the sole purpose of entering this Order. FURTHER ORDERED that this action be transferred to the United States District Court for Eastern District of North Carolina. (Hicks, Samantha) |
CASE REFERRED for Screening, Motion Referred: RE: #1 APPLICATION to Proceed IFP, to MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD. (Hicks, Samantha) |
Case ASSIGNED to JUDGE LORETTA C. BIGGS and MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD. (Hicks, Samantha) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by ANTHONY MARK ESSICK. (Hicks, Samantha) |
Filing 1 APPLICATION to Proceed IFP by ANTHONY MARK ESSICK. (Hicks, Samantha) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.