ONEIL v. KIJAKAZI
DAVID ONEIL |
KILOLO KIJAKAZI |
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION |
1:2021cv00951 |
December 16, 2021 |
US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
LORETTA C BIGGS |
JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER signed by JUDGE LORETTA C. BIGGS on 01/14/2022; that Plaintiff's Motion for transfer in this case from the Middle District of North Carolina to the Eastern District of North Carolina is GRANTED and this case is therefore DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. (Hicks, Samantha) |
Filing 4 *****FILED IN ERROR****MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by DAVID ONEIL. Response to Motion due by 2/3/2022 (CLAUSON, VAUGHN) Modified on 1/13/2022 to reflect filed in error per the filer. (Butler, Carol) |
Motion Submitted: #3 MOTION to Transfer Case to JUDGE LORETTA C. BIGGS. (Blay, Debbie) |
Filing 3 MOTION to Transfer Case by DAVID ONEIL. Response to Motion due by 2/2/2022 (CLAUSON, VAUGHN) |
Filing 2 APPLICATION to Proceed IFP () by DAVID ONEIL. (CLAUSON, VAUGHN) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against KILOLO KIJAKAZI, filed by DAVID ONEIL.(CLAUSON, VAUGHN) |
Motions Referred to MAG/JUDGE JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE RE: #2 APPLICATION to Proceed IFP. (Carter, Alexus) |
Case ASSIGNED to JUDGE LORETTA C. BIGGS and MAG/JUDGE JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE. (Carter, Alexus) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.