RICCORDELLA et al v. FANDUEL GROUP
| VINCENT MARK RICCORDELLA and MICHELLE RICCORDELLA |
| FANDUEL GROUP |
| 1:2022cv00370 |
| May 13, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| CATHERINE C EAGLES |
| JOE L WEBSTER |
| Fraud or Truth-In-Lending |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Motions Referred: RE: #9 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #3 Complaint to MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER (Winchester, Robin) |
| Filing 9 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #3 Complaint by FANDUEL GROUP. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Pltf's dismissal mailed to court, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(LINDHOLM, ROBERT) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by MICHELLE RICCORDELLA, VINCENT MARK RICCORDELLA. (Attachments: #1 Envelope - Front and Back) (Bowers, Alexis) |
| Filing 10 ***filed in error***MOTION to Dismiss without prejudice by MICHELLE RICCORDELLA, VINCENT MARK RICCORDELLA. Response to Motion due by 6/29/2022. (Attachments: #1 Envelope - Front and Back) (Bowers, Alexis) Modified on 6/10/2022 to file in error (Bowers, Alexis). |
| Motions Referred: RE: #8 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER (Winchester, Robin) |
| TEXT ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer filed by FANDUEL GROUP. For good cause shown, Defendant shall have up to and including June 10, 2022 to file an answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint. Issued by MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER on 5/19/2022.(Lee, Pedra) |
| Answer updated for FANDUEL GROUP to 6/10/2022. (Hicks, Samantha) |
| Filing 8 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by FANDUEL GROUP. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(LINDHOLM, ROBERT) |
| Filing 7 STANDARD ORDER for civil cases proceeding before JUDGE CATHERINE C. EAGLES.(Winchester, Robin) |
| Filing 6 Notice of Right to Consent. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) (Carter, Alexus) |
| Case ASSIGNED to JUDGE CATHERINE C. EAGLES and MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER. (Carter, Alexus) |
| Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Defendants FANDUEL GROUP, FanDuel Group Parent, LLC, TSE Holdings Ltd., Boyd Interactive Gaming, LLC, Flutter Entertainment plc identifying Corporate Parent FanDuel Group Parent, LLC, Corporate Parent TSE Holdings Ltd., Corporate Parent Boyd Interactive Gaming, LLC, Corporate Parent Flutter Entertainment plc for FANDUEL GROUP.. (LINDHOLM, ROBERT) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to FANDUEL GROUP. (Originally filed in Cabarrus County Superior Court, Case Number 22-CVS-1097, issued 4/11/2022, and listed as Exhibit 1 to the Petition for Removal.) (Carter, Alexus) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT against FANDUEL GROUP, filed by VINCENT MARK RICCORDELLA, MICHELLE RICCORDELLA. (Originally filed in Cabarrus County Superior Court, Case Number 22-CVS-1097, and listed as Exhibit 1 to the Petition for Removal.) (Carter, Alexus) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by attorney ROBERT L. LINDHOLM on behalf of Defendant FanDuel Group, Inc. (LINDHOLM, ROBERT) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REMOVAL against Michelle Riccordella, Vincent Mark Riccordella ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANCMDC-3298008.), filed by FanDuel Group, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State Court File, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(LINDHOLM, ROBERT) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
