ESTATE OF JOSEPH LOPEZ v. HAMILTON et al
ESTATE OF JOSEPH LOPEZ |
MATTHEW HAMILTON and CITY OF GREENSBORO |
1:2022cv00421 |
June 6, 2022 |
US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
LORETTA C BIGGS |
JOE L WEBSTER |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by attorney SONNY S. HAYNES on behalf of Defendant CITY OF GREENSBORO (HAYNES, SONNY) |
Filing 14 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by CITY OF GREENSBORO. (HAYNES, SONNY) |
Filing 13 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by attorney WALTER K. BURTON on behalf of Defendant MATTHEW HAMILTON (BURTON, WALTER) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Special Appearance by attorney G. FLINT TAYLOR on behalf of Plaintiff ESTATE OF JOSEPH LOPEZ ( Filing fee $ 25 receipt number ANCMDC-3334817.) (TAYLOR, G. FLINT) |
Filing 11 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by MATTHEW HAMILTON. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Granting Motion for Extension of Time to respond to complaint)(ROSSABI, AMIEL) |
ORDER granting #11 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer for MATTHEW HAMILTON. Answer due by 8/18/2022. Signed by John Brubaker, Clerk of Court, on 7/7/2022. (Brubaker, John) |
Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by ESTATE OF JOSEPH LOPEZ as to MATTHEW HAMILTON served on 6/29/2022, answer due 7/20/2022. Matthew Hamilton (HOLT, GRAHAM) |
Filing 9 ***FILED IN ERROR***NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by attorney GEORGE F. TAYLOR on behalf of Plaintiff ESTATE OF JOSEPH LOPEZ (TAYLOR, GEORGE) Modified on 7/5/2022 to mark as filed in error. Document not flattened and incorrect event used. (Hicks, Samantha) |
Case Reassigned to JUDGE LORETTA C. BIGGS. JUDGE CATHERINE C. EAGLES no longer assigned to the case. (Marsh, Keah) |
Filing 8 NOTICE by CITY OF GREENSBORO re #7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer (SIZEMORE, POLLY) |
ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer for CITY OF GREENSBORO. Answer due by 7/29/2022. Signed by John Brubaker, Clerk of Court, on 06/29/2022. (Brubaker, John) |
Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by CITY OF GREENSBORO. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(SIZEMORE, POLLY) Modified on 6/29/2022 to correct event. (Taylor, Abby). |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by ESTATE OF JOSEPH LOPEZ as to CITY OF GREENSBORO served on 6/8/2022, answer due 6/29/2022. City Clerk Angela Lord (HOLT, GRAHAM) |
Filing 5 STANDARD ORDER for civil cases proceeding before JUDGE CATHERINE C. EAGLES.(Winchester, Robin) |
Filing 4 Notice of Right to Consent. Counsel shall serve the attached form on all parties. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) (Carter, Alexus) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Summons - CITY OF GREENSBORO) (Carter, Alexus) |
Case ASSIGNED to JUDGE CATHERINE C. EAGLES and MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER. (Carter, Alexus) |
CASE REFERRED to Mediation pursuant to Local Rule 83.9b of the Rules of Practice and Procedure of this Court. Please go to our website under Attorney Information for a list of mediators which must be served on all parties. (Carter, Alexus) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Special Appearance by attorney BEN H. ELSON on behalf of Plaintiff ESTATE OF JOSEPH LOPEZ (Filing fee $ 25 receipt number ANCMDC-3312583) (ELSON, BEN) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANCMDC-3312569.), filed by ESTATE OF JOSEPH LOPEZ.(HOLT, GRAHAM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.