CRUMP v. NANCE
| Brooke McIntosh Crump |
| 1:2022cv00484 |
| June 23, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| Constitutional - State Statute |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal-Injunctive/Declaratory Relief |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 First MOTION to Amend #2 First MOTION to Seal Case by Brooke McIntosh Crump. Response to Motion due by 6/24/2022 (CRUMP, BROOKE) |
| Filing 2 First MOTION to Seal Case by Brooke McIntosh Crump. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(CRUMP, BROOKE) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REMOVAL against JOHN R. NANCE, filed by Brooke McIntosh Crump. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(CRUMP, BROOKE) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: CRUMP v. NANCE | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Brooke McIntosh Crump | |
| Represented By: | BROOKE M. CRUMP |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
