PARKS-EL v. DIGGS
Petitioner: SHAWN DEWAYNE PARKS-EL
Respondent: MR. KENNETH DIGGS
Case Number: 1:2022cv00514
Filed: July 1, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Presiding Judge: WILLIAM L OSTEEN
Referring Judge: JOE L WEBSTER
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 24, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL AND SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL on behalf of Respondent KENNETH DIGGS. CADEN WILLIAM HAYES is substituted as counsel for Respondent. Attorney KRISTIN JO UICKER terminated. (HAYES, CADEN)
August 11, 2022 ***Attorney KRISTIN JO UICKER for KENNETH DIGGS added. (Bowers, Alexis)
August 11, 2022 Set/Reset Deadlines/Hearings: KENNETH DIGGS answer due 9/14/2022. (Bowers, Alexis)
August 5, 2022 Receipt of Funds in the amount of $ 5.00. Receipt Number NCM058244. (Bowers, Alexis)
July 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER signed by MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER on 07/22/2022, that the Petitioner be, and is hereby, permitted to file said action in this Court without prepayment of the $5.00 fee, but that further proceedings be stayed 30 days from the entry of this Order or until Petitioner has submitted to the Court the $5.00 filing fee, whichever date is earlier. Petitioner's failure to submit the $5.00 filing fee within the 30-day period will result in the dismissal of this action without prejudice to Petitioner filing a new petition, accompanied by a five-dollar filing fee or a current application to proceed in forma pauperis. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, upon the submission of the $5.00 filing fee by Petitioner within the 30-day period, Respondent shall file an answer with this Court, pursuant to Rules 4 and 5, Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases: within forty ( 40) days from the date Petitioner's filing fee is received. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER IN A TIMELY MANNER WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE OF THIS ACTION WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE TO PETITIONER. (Bowers, Alexis)
July 22, 2022 Filing 3 MEMORANDUM of Law in Support of Habeas Corpus 28 U.S.C. 2254 by Petitioner SHAWN DEWAYNE PARKS-EL. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Envelope - Front and Back) (Bowers, Alexis)
July 6, 2022 Case Assigned to JUDGE WILLIAM L. OSTEEN, JR and MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER. (Butler, Carol)
July 6, 2022 CASE REFERRED for Screening (Butler, Carol)
July 1, 2022 Filing 2 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by SHAWN DEWAYNE PARKS-EL. (Attachments: #1 Envelope - Front and Back)(Butler, Carol) (Main Document[ ]2 replaced on 7/6/2022 to correct image) (Butler, Carol)
July 1, 2022 Filing 1 APPLICATION to Proceed IFP by SHAWN DEWAYNE PARKS-EL. (Butler, Carol)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: PARKS-EL v. DIGGS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: SHAWN DEWAYNE PARKS-EL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: MR. KENNETH DIGGS
Represented By: CADEN WILLIAM HAYES
Represented By: KRISTIN JO UICKER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?