RODGERS v. THE TOWN OF CHINA GROVE et al
DAVID R. RODGERS |
THE TOWN OF CHINA GROVE, OFFICER JEREMY VAIL, OFFICER JEFFREY WASHAM and CHIEF OF POLICE ANDREW DEAL |
1:2022cv00518 |
July 5, 2022 |
US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
JOE L WEBSTER |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 NOTICE of Initial Pretrial Conference Hearing: Initial Pretrial Conference Hearing set for 10/19/2022 09:30 AM in Durham Courtroom #1 before MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER. (Garrett, Kim) |
Filing 4 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by ANDREW DEAL, THE TOWN OF CHINA GROVE, JEREMY VAIL, JEFFREY WASHAM. (WRIGHT, JOHN) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (Carter, Alexus) |
Receipt of Funds in the amount of $ 2.00. Receipt Number: NCM058147. (Carter, Alexus) |
CASE REFERRED to MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER. (Carter, Alexus) |
CASE REFERRED to Standing Order 30. (Carter, Alexus) |
Case ASSIGNED to UNASSIGNED and MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER. (Carter, Alexus) |
Receipt of Funds in the amount of $ 400.00. (Receipt Number: NCM057972) (Carter, Alexus) Modified on 7/7/2022 to reflect that funds were received on 7/5/2022. (Carter, Alexus). |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET. (Carter, Alexus) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by DAVID R. RODGERS. (Carter, Alexus) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.