FULLARD v. ROBERTSON et al
Plaintiff: REGINALD UNDERWOOD FULLARD
Defendant: C. K. ROBERTSON, B. S. VALENTINE, B. VALENTINE and UNKNOWN OFFICERS, AGENTS AND DEFENDANTS
Case Number: 1:2022cv00530
Filed: July 8, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Presiding Judge: LORETTA C BIGGS
Referring Judge: JOE L WEBSTER
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition)
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 18, 2022 Filing 3 Notice of Mailing Recommendation. Objections to R&R due by 9/1/2022. Objections to R&R for Pro Se due by 9/6/2022. (Hicks, Samantha)
August 18, 2022 Filing 2 RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE signed by MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER on 8/18/2022; that this action be dismissed without prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to comply with the Court's prior Order. (Hicks, Samantha)
July 13, 2022 TEXT ORDER: The filing fee was not received nor was a proper affidavit to proceed In Forma Pauperis submitted, with sufficient information completed and signed by Plaintiff, to permit review. The Court ORDERS the Clerk to send Plaintiff a current Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Long Form). Plaintiff shall submit the filing fee or the Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis to the Court no later than August 10, 2022. Failure to do so may result in dismissal of this action without further notice. Issued by MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER on 07/13/2022. (Pender, Rachel)
July 13, 2022 CASE REFERRED to MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER. (Carter, Alexus)
July 13, 2022 Case ASSIGNED to JUDGE LORETTA C. BIGGS and MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER. (Carter, Alexus)
July 8, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by REGINALD UNDERWOOD FULLARD. (Attachments: #1 Envelope - Front and Back) (Carter, Alexus) (Main Document 1 replaced on 7/13/2022 to correct PDF error.) (Carter, Alexus).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: FULLARD v. ROBERTSON et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: REGINALD UNDERWOOD FULLARD
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: C. K. ROBERTSON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: B. S. VALENTINE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: B. VALENTINE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UNKNOWN OFFICERS, AGENTS AND DEFENDANTS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?