TAEKMAN v. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
| JEFFREY TAEKMAN, M.D. |
| UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA |
| 1:2022cv00605 |
| August 1, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| L PATRICK AULD |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
NOTICE of Initial Pretrial Conference Hearing: Initial Pretrial Conference Hearing set for 10/31/2022 09:30 AM in Greensboro Courtroom #1A before MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD. (Garrett, Kim)
|
|
Filing 7
Corporate Disclosure Statement by Defendants UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, UNUM GROUP identifying Corporate Parent UNUM GROUP for UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA.. (SALUTA, GEMMA)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by attorney GEMMA L. SALUTA on behalf of Defendant UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA (SALUTA, GEMMA)
|
|
Filing 5
ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA. (SALUTA, GEMMA)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by attorney CAITLIN TELLECHEA AUGERSON on behalf of Defendant UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA (AUGERSON, CAITLIN)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(SALUTA, GEMMA)
|
|
ORDER granting #3 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer for UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA. Answer due by 9/19/2022. Signed by John Brubaker, Clerk of Court, on 8/26/2022. (Brubaker, John)
|
|
Filing 2
Summons Issued as to UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA. (Sheets, Jamie)
|
|
CASE REFERRED to Mediation pursuant to Local Rule 83.9b of the Rules of Practice and Procedure of this Court. Please go to our website under Attorney Information for a list of mediators which must be served on all parties. (Sheets, Jamie)
|
|
Case ASSIGNED to UNASSIGNED and MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD. (Sheets, Jamie)
|
|
CASE REFERRED to Standing Order 30. (Sheets, Jamie)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANCMDC-3349831), filed by JEFFREY TAEKMAN, M.D. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (MATESIC, RACHEL) (Attachment 1 replaced on 8/3/2022 with flattened PDF) (Sheets, Jamie)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: TAEKMAN v. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: JEFFREY TAEKMAN, M.D. | |
| Represented By: | RACHEL C. MATESIC |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | CAITLIN TELLECHEA AUGERSON |
| Represented By: | GEMMA L. SALUTA |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
