MCCOLLUM v. VIRGIL et al
Plaintiff: LENA MCCOLLUM
Defendant: RODERICK C. VIRGIL, WILLIAM TART, JERIMI KABABIK, INSURER OF SHERIFF'S SURETY OR LIABILITY BOND, TIMOTHY RUGG and KELLY JACOBS
Case Number: 1:2022cv00662
Filed: August 15, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Presiding Judge: WILLIAM L OSTEEN
Referring Judge: JOE L WEBSTER
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 26, 2022 Filing 5 Envelope Containing #4 Order addressed to LENA MCCOLLUM, P.O. BOX 64451, FAYETTEVILLE, NC 28306, returned to court by postal service, marked undeliverable because Attempted - Not Known. (Sheets, Jamie)
September 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS signed by MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER on 9/8/2022; that the plaintiff in the above-entitled proceeding be, and is hereby, permitted to commence said proceeding in this Court without prepayment of fees or costs, or giving security therefor. [28 U.S.C. 1915(a)] The plaintiff is responsible for preparing and delivering to the Clerk, the correct summons for service on each defendant, including the correct address and the name and title of the individual to be served on behalf of a corporation, association, infant, incompetent or government agency. Failure to prepare and deliver said summons within 15 days from the filing of this order shall result in this case being dismissed without further notice. The U.S. Marshal shall serve the summons and complaint upon each defendant. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall terminate the plaintiffs original application to proceed in forma pauperis (Docket Entry #1 ). (Carter, Alexus)
September 7, 2022 Motions Referred to MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER RE: #3 APPLICATION to Proceed IFP. (Sheets, Jamie)
September 6, 2022 Filing 3 APPLICATION to Proceed IFP by LENA MCCOLLUM. (Attachments: #1 Envelope - Front and Back) (Sheets, Jamie)
August 17, 2022 TEXT ORDER: This matter has been referred to the undersigned for review of #1 Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis ("IFP"). It appears that Plaintiff filed a document indicating the funds she receives monthly from a governmental source. However, to fully assess whether or not Plaintiff qualifies for IPF status, the Court will ORDER Plaintiff to complete an application to proceed IFP. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Clerk shall send Plaintiff a copy of the Application to Proceed IFP (long form) along with this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall have up to and including Friday, September 16, 2022 to fully complete, sign, and submit said form to the Court. Failure to comply with this Order may result in dismissal of this action. Issued by MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER on 08/17/2022. (Pender, Rachel)
August 16, 2022 Case ASSIGNED to JUDGE WILLIAM L. OSTEEN, JR and MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER. (Carter, Alexus)
August 16, 2022 Motions Referred to MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER RE: #1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. (Carter, Alexus)
August 15, 2022 Filing 2 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by LENA MCCOLLUM. (Carter, Alexus)
August 15, 2022 Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by LENA MCCOLLUM. (Attachments: #1 Envelope - Front and Back) (Carter, Alexus)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MCCOLLUM v. VIRGIL et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: LENA MCCOLLUM
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: RODERICK C. VIRGIL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: WILLIAM TART
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JERIMI KABABIK
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: INSURER OF SHERIFF'S SURETY OR LIABILITY BOND
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: TIMOTHY RUGG
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: KELLY JACOBS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?