GRAHAM v. ALBRO
| JACK H. GRAHAM, III doing business as KATHYE'S JEWELRY AND PAWN SHOP |
| STEVE ALBRO |
| 1:2022cv00708 |
| August 26, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| L PATRICK AULD |
| Administrative Procedure Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER signed by JUDGE WILLIAM L. OSTEEN, JR on 10/03/2022, that Plaintiff's Withdrawal of Motion, (Doc. #5 ), is GRANTED, and that Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction, (Doc. #3 ) filed on September 16, 2022 is hereby DENIED as moot. (Taylor, Abby)
|
|
Filing 8
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE ON GOVERNMENT on Certified Mail Receipt as to All Defendants. on Certified Mail Receipt as to Merrick Garland (WILSON, JAMES)
|
|
Filing 7
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE ON GOVERNMENT as to JACK H. GRAHAM, III served on 9/9/2022, answer due 11/8/2022. as to (WILSON, JAMES)
|
|
Filing 6
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE by Certified Mail Receipt as to All Defendants. (WILSON, JAMES)
|
|
Filing 5
MOTION to Withdraw Document #3 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by JACK H. GRAHAM, III. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(WILSON, JAMES)
|
|
Motion Submitted to JUDGE WILLIAM L. OSTEEN, JR., re: #3 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order. (Daniel, J)
|
|
Filing 4
MEMORANDUM OF LAW in support of #3 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction . (WILSON, JAMES) Modified on 9/19/2022 to and additional language as reflected in the filing. (Powell, Gloria).
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction by JACK H. GRAHAM, III. Response to Motion due by 10/7/2022 (WILSON, JAMES) Modified on 9/19/2022 to include "and Preliminary Injunction." (Powell, Gloria).
|
|
Filing 2
Summons Issued as to STEVE ALBRO, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (Attachments: #1 Summons - U.S. Attorney, #2 Summons - Attorney General) (Carter, Alexus)
|
|
Case ASSIGNED to UNASSIGNED and MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD. (Carter, Alexus)
|
|
CASE REFERRED to Standing Order 30. (Carter, Alexus)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT (PETITION FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW) against STEVE ALBRO ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANCMDC-3369070.), filed by JACK D GRAHAM. (WILSON, JAMES) (Main Document 1 replaced on 8/26/2022 to correct filing error.) (Carter, Alexus). Modified on 8/26/2022 to include full title of document. (Carter, Alexus).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: GRAHAM v. ALBRO | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: JACK H. GRAHAM, III doing business as KATHYE'S JEWELRY AND PAWN SHOP | |
| Represented By: | JAMES BARRETT WILSON, JR. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: STEVE ALBRO | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
