TYLER v. DAVIDSON COUNTY
| KEYWAHN O'BRIEN TYLER, JR. |
| DAVIDSON COUNTY |
| 1:2022cv00743 |
| September 6, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| L PATRICK AULD |
| N C TILLEY |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 OBJECTION TO RECOMMENDED RULING - MAGISTRATE JUDGE re #4 Recommended Ruling - Magistrate Judge, by Petitioner KEYWAHN O'BRIEN TYLER, JR. Response to Objections to R&R due by 10/7/2022. (Attachments: #1 Envelope - Front and Back) (Sheets, Jamie) |
| Filing 5 Notice of Mailing Recommendation: Objections to R&R due by 9/27/2022. Objections to R&R for Pro Se due by 9/30/2022. (Sheets, Jamie) |
Filing 4
ORDER AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE signed by MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD on 9/13/2022; that Petitioner's Application (Docket Entry #1 ) to proceed in forma pauperis is granted for the sole purpose of entering this Order and Recommendation and that Petitioner's Motion (Docket Entry #3 ) seeking counsel is denied without prejudice to him filing a motion for counsel in conjunction with any properly filed action. RECOMMENDED that this action be filed and dismissed sua sponte without prejudice to Petitioner promptly filing a corrected motion on the proper 2255 forms if he seeks to challenge his federal conviction or a 2241 petition after requesting the proper forms if he seeks to challenge his pending state charges. (Sheets, Jamie)
|
|
ORDER signed by MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD on 9/13/2022; Petitioner's Application (Docket Entry #1 ) to proceed in forma pauperis is granted for the sole purpose of entering #4 Order and Recommendation; Petitioner's Motion (Docket Entry #3 ) seeking counsel is denied without prejudice to him filing a motion for counsel in conjunction with any properly filed action. (Sheets, Jamie)
|
| CASE REFERRED for Screening (Butler, Carol) |
| Case Assigned to JUDGE N. C. TILLEY, JR and MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD. (Butler, Carol) |
| Filing 3 LETTER MOTION to Appoint Counsel by KEYWAHN O'BRIEN TYLER, JR. (Attachments: #1 Envelope - Front and Back) (Sheets, Jamie) |
| Filing 2 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (pursuant to 28: U.S.C. 2241), filed by KEYWAHN O'BRIEN TYLER, JR. (Attachments: #1 Envelope - Front and Back)(Butler, Carol) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION to Proceed IFP by KEYWAHN O'BRIEN TYLER, JR. (Butler, Carol) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: TYLER v. DAVIDSON COUNTY | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: KEYWAHN O'BRIEN TYLER, JR. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: DAVIDSON COUNTY | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
