ALLEN v. CAMERON & CAMERON et al
| DERRICK ALLEN |
| CAMERON & CAMERON, BENNIE CAMERON and BJ CAMERON |
| 1:2022cv00795 |
| September 21, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| L PATRICK AULD |
| THOMAS D SCHROEDER |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 USCA Pre-filing review case docketed re #7 Notice of Appeal Without Fee Payment filed by DERRICK ALLEN. USCA Case Manager: Ashley Brownlee. USCA Case Number 22-298. (Sheets, Jamie) |
| Filing 8 Electronic Transmission of Notice of Appeal and Docket Sheet to US Court of Appeals re #7 Notice of Appeal Without Fee Payment. (Sheets, Jamie) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEAL Without Fee Payment as to #6 Judgment, by DERRICK ALLEN. (Sheets, Jamie) |
| Filing 6 JUDGMENT signed by CHIEF JUDGE THOMAS D. SCHROEDER on 10/19/2022 adopting the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation; that this action is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B) as frivolous and for failure to state a claim. (Sheets, Jamie) |
| CASE REFERRED to CHIEF JUDGE THOMAS D. SCHROEDER RE: RECOMMENDED RULING by MAGISTRATE JUDGE. (Engle, Anita) |
| Filing 5 Notice of Mailing Recommendation. Objections to R&R due by 10/7/2022. Objections to R&R for Pro Se due by 10/11/2022. (Hicks, Samantha) |
| TEXT ORDER terminating #1 Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs, in light of the Text Recommendation of dismissal entered this day. Issued by MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD on 09/23/2022. (AULD, L.) |
| TEXT RECOMMENDATION that the Court dismiss this action under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B) as frivolous and for failure to state a claim. First, #2 Complaint lacks any factual allegations showing that Defendants (a business, its owner, and his son) acted under color of state law so as to trigger potential civil liability for alleged violations of the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution (as made actionable via 42 U.S.C. s 1983), arising from a workplace dispute. Second, Plaintiff cannot pursue a claim under 18 U.S.C. s 242. In connection with many prior actions, the Court repeatedly has advised Plaintiff of each of the foregoing requirements/prohibitions (i.e., the state-action requirement under Section 1983 and the prohibition against private actions under Section 242). Plaintiff's persistence in filing frivolous federal actions supports the denial of future pauper applications under the discretionary authority of 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(1), without consideration of the substance of his related complaints under the provisions of Section 1915(e)(2)(B). See Blakely v. Wards, 738 F.3d 607, 612 (4th Cir. 2013); see also id. at 619-22 (Wilkinson, J., concurring), 624 (Duncan, J., concurring). Issued by MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD on 09/23/2022. (AULD, L.) |
| Motions Referred to MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD RE: #1 APPLICATION to Proceed IFP. (Carter, Alexus) |
| Case ASSIGNED to CHIEF JUDGE THOMAS D. SCHROEDER and MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD. (Carter, Alexus) |
| Filing 4 Notice of Signed Pro Se Electronic Service Consent by DERRICK ALLEN 78DERRICKALLEN@GMAIL.COM. (Sheets, Jamie) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET. (Sheets, Jamie) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against CAMERON & CAMERON, BENNIE CAMERON, BJ CAMERON, filed by DERRICK ALLEN. (Sheets, Jamie) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION to Proceed IFP by DERRICK ALLEN. (Sheets, Jamie) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
