RICCI v. DUKE UNIVERSITY
| PATRICIA A. RICCI |
| DUKE UNIVERSITY |
| 1:2022cv00889 |
| October 19, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| CATHERINE C EAGLES |
| JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff PATRICIA A. RICCI re #8 MOTION to Compel Arbitration and Dismiss or Stay Proceedings filed by DUKE UNIVERSITY filed by PATRICIA A. RICCI. Replies due by 12/21/2022. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Envelope - Front and Back) (Hicks, Samantha) |
| Filing 9 MEMORANDUM filed by Defendant DUKE UNIVERSITY re #8 MOTION to Compel Arbitration and Dismiss or Stay Proceedings filed by DUKE UNIVERSITY. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Declaration of Antwan-La'Mont Lofton, #2 Exhibit 2 - Declaration of Lauren G. Goetzl)(GOETZL, LAUREN) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Compel Arbitration and Dismiss or Stay Proceedings by DUKE UNIVERSITY. Response to Motion due by 12/13/2022 Response to Motion due by 12/13/2022 (GOETZL, LAUREN) |
| Filing 6 STANDARD ORDER for civil cases proceeding before JUDGE CATHERINE C. EAGLES. (Winchester, Robin) |
| Filing 7 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE as to DUKE UNIVERSITY served on 11/1/2022, answer due 11/22/2022. (Attachments: #1 Envelope - Front and Back) (Hicks, Samantha) |
| Filing 5 Notice of Right to Consent. Counsel shall serve the attached form on all parties. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) (Carter, Alexus) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to DUKE UNIVERSITY. (Carter, Alexus) |
| Case ASSIGNED to JUDGE CATHERINE C. EAGLES and MAG/JUDGE JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE. (Carter, Alexus) |
| Filing 3 AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF COMPLAINT re: #1 Complaint, filed by Plaintiff PATRICIA A. RICCI. (Carter, Alexus) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET. (Carter, Alexus) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR DISCRIMINATION, RETALIATION, AND PROHIBITED ACTIONS ON THE BASIS OF DISABILITY against DUKE UNIVERSITY, filed by PATRICIA A. RICCI. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-1, #2 Exhibit A-2, #3 Exhibit A-3, #4 Exhibit A-4, #5 Exhibit A-5, #6 Exhibit A-6, #7 Exhibit A-7, #8 Exhibit A-8, #9 Exhibit A-9, #10 Exhibit A-10, #11 Exhibit A-11, #12 Exhibit A-12, #13 Exhibit A-13, #14 Exhibit A-14, #15 Exhibit A-15, #16 Exhibit A-16, #17 Exhibit A-17, #18 Exhibit A-18, #19 Exhibit A-19) (Carter, Alexus) |
| Receipt of Funds in the amount of $ 402.00. Receipt Number: 16. (Carter, Alexus) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: RICCI v. DUKE UNIVERSITY | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: PATRICIA A. RICCI | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: DUKE UNIVERSITY | |
| Represented By: | LAUREN G. GOETZL |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
