BROWN v. KIJAKAZI
| CHRISTOPHER BROWN |
| KILOLO KIJAKAZI |
| SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION |
| 1:2022cv00920 |
| November 2, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| JOE L WEBSTER |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE ON GOVERNMENT on Complaint & Summons as to KILOLO KIJAKAZI served on 11/18/2022, answer due 1/17/2023. on Complaint & Summons as to (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(PIEMONTE, GEORGE)
|
|
Filing 5
Summons Issued as to KILOLO KIJAKAZI, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (Carter, Alexus)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS signed by MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER on 11/15/2022; that the plaintiff in the above-entitled proceeding be, and is hereby, permitted to commence said proceeding in this Court without prepayment of fees or costs, or giving security therefor. [28 U.S.C. 1915(a)] Plaintiff is responsible for preparing and delivering to the Clerk, the correct summons for service on each defendant, including the correct address and the name and title of the individual to be served on behalf of a corporation, association, infant, incompetent or government agency. Failure to prepare and deliver said summons within 15 days from the filing of this order shall result in this case being dismissed without further notice. Plaintiff is responsible for service of the complaint and summons upon the defendant. (Carter, Alexus)
|
|
Filing 3
Amended MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by CHRISTOPHER BROWN. (PIEMONTE, GEORGE)
|
|
Motions Referred to MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER RE: #3 Amended MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. (Carter, Alexus)
|
|
TEXT ORDER Denying without prejudice #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (IFP). Plaintiff seeks to proceed IFP in this matter. Section One of the IFP application indicates a total of zero for the sources of income for both Plaintiff and his spouse. (See Docket Entry 2 at 1-2.) However, Plaintiff later indicates that he is "currently being supported by [his] wife she pays all the bills we have nothing." (Id. at 5.) In addition, Plaintiff has indicated that he expects major changes to his monthly income or expenses or in his assets or liabilities during the next 12 months but has not provided further explanation. (See id.) As Plaintiff's IFP application has provided incomplete and inconsistent information, his motion will be denied without prejudice to filing a renewed Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. If Plaintiff is fully supported by his spouse, the income source of his spouse should be accurately reflected in Section One of the IFP application. Plaintiff shall have up to and including November 17, 2022 to file a renewed Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, or alternatively, to pay the filing fee in this matter. Issued by MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER on 11/3/2022.(Lee, Pedra)
|
|
Case ASSIGNED to UNASSIGNED and MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER. (Carter, Alexus)
|
|
Motions Referred to MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER RE: #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. (Carter, Alexus)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by CHRISTOPHER BROWN. (PIEMONTE, GEORGE)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against KILOLO KIJAKAZI, filed by CHRISTOPHER BROWN.(PIEMONTE, GEORGE)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
