GOLDEN et al v. NATIONAL GOLF DISTRIBUTORS, LLC et al
| JESSICA GOLDEN, JESSE GOLDEN, EVA PEPAJ, LINA POSADA, TIFFANY TOTH GRAY and CIELO JEAN CJ GIBSON |
| NATIONAL GOLF DISTRIBUTORS, LLC doing business as MIRAGE and ISABELLA ADKINS |
| 1:2022cv00987 |
| November 17, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| LORETTA C BIGGS |
| JOE L WEBSTER |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by attorney MATTHEW RYAN GAMBALE on behalf of Plaintiffs TIFFANY TOTH GRAY, CIELO JEAN CJ GIBSON, JESSICA GOLDEN, EVA PEPAJ, LINA POSADA (GAMBALE, MATTHEW) Modified on 11/17/2022 to correct party names. (Carter, Alexus). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY TRIAL DEMANDED against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANCMDC-3430127.), filed by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - Jessica Golden Photographs, #3 Exhibit B - Eva Pepaj Photographs, #4 Exhibit C - Lina Posada Photographs, #5 Exhibit D - Tiffany Gray Photographs, #6 Exhibit E - CJ Gibson Photographs) (GAMBALE, MATTHEW) Modified on 11/17/2022 to include complete title of document and correct party information. (Carter, Alexus). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
