SATTERFIELD v. CHANDLER
MARCUS ANTONIO SATTERFIELD |
CAPTAIN RODNEY CHANDLER, SGT ELLIS, LT. GUILL and CAPTAIN MARK MASSEY |
1:2022cv00995 |
November 18, 2022 |
US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
WILLIAM L OSTEEN |
JOE L WEBSTER |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ORDER signed by MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER on 01/06/2023, that the Clerk shall send Plaintiff a summons for each defendant named in the complaint. Plaintiff must fill out a summons for each defendant, including an address suitable for service, and then return the summons(es) to the Clerk. Failure to provide an address wherein service may be made on any defendant will result in the dismissal of the action as to all such unserved defendants after 90 days from the filing of the complaint. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, upon return of the properly completed summons(es), the United States Marshal shall serve the complaint on the defendant(s). (Bowers, Alexis) |
Receipt of Funds in the amount of $ 72.50. Receipt Number 637. (Bowers, Alexis) |
Filing 5 Notice of Mailing Recommendation. Objections to R&R due by 12/19/2022. Objections to R&R for Pro Se due by 12/22/2022. (Taylor, Abby) |
Filing 4 ORDER AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE signed by MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER on 12/05/2022, that in Informa pauperis status be granted for the sole purpose of entering this Order and Recommendation. FURTHER ORDERED that within twenty (20) days from the date of this Order, Plaintiff make an initial filing fee payment of $45.00, which is the statutorily mandated amount of $50.00 less the $5.00 Plaintiff already paid. FURTHER that Plaintiff's trust officer shall be directed to pay to the Clerk of this Court 20% of all deposits to his account starting with the month of January of 2023, and thereafter each time that the amount in the account exceeds $10.00 until the $350.00 filing fee has been paid. FURTHER ORDERED that this action be filed, but that further proceedings and service procedures be stayed until Plaintiff has either (1) submitted to the Court the initial payment noted above, or (2) in the alternative has submitted a motion for relief from the stay, and a statement made under penalty of perjury that he has not had access to any funds for the initial payment noted above for the 60-day period. RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff's claims be dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915A for failing to state a claim upon which relief may be granted except for his excessive force claim against Defendant Guill. That claim should be allowed to proceed.(Taylor, Abby) |
ORDER signed by MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER on 12/05/2022, granting #1 Motion for Application to Proceed IFP; granting #2 Motion for Application to Proceed IFP for the sole purpose of entering this Order and Recommendation. (Taylor, Abby) |
CASE REFERRED for Screening (Taylor, Abby) |
Case Assigned to JUDGE WILLIAM L. OSTEEN, JR and MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER. (Taylor, Abby) |
Receipt of Funds in the amount of $ 5.00., Receipt#293. (Taylor, Abby) |
Filing 3 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by MARCUS ANTONIO SATTERFIELD. (Attachments: #1 cover letter, #2 Envelope - Front and Back)(Taylor, Abby) |
Filing 2 APPLICATION to Proceed IFP by MARCUS ANTONIO SATTERFIELD. (Taylor, Abby) |
Filing 1 APPLICATION to Proceed IFP by MARCUS ANTONIO SATTERFIELD. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Taylor, Abby) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.