SANDERS v. TOMPSON et al
| LEVAN LAFORREST SANDERS |
| KELLY TOMPSON, AVERY MICHELLE CRUMP and EDWARD BRUSCNO, JR. |
| 1:2022cv01027 |
| November 28, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| CATHERINE C EAGLES |
| JOE L WEBSTER |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
STANDARD ORDER for civil cases proceeding before JUDGE CATHERINE C. EAGLES.(Winchester, Robin)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER AND JUDGMENT, signed by JUDGE CATHERINE C. EAGLES on 01/11/2023, that this action is dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915A to the extent that it seeks monetary relief against defendants Tompson and Crump who are immune from such relief, and otherwise dismissed as to those defendants because it seeks no proper form of relief from them. The action is allowed to proceed as to defendant Bruscno. The plaintiff shall promptly seek and obtain service of process on the defendant Bruscno in compliance with the Magistrate Judge's Order.(Taylor, Abby)
|
|
CASE REFERRED RE: #3 RECOMMENDED RULING - MAGISTRATE JUDGE to JUDGE CATHERINE C. EAGLES (Winchester, Robin)
|
|
Filing 4
Notice of Mailing Recommendation. Objections to R&R due by 12/27/2022. Objections to R&R for Pro Se due by 1/3/2023.(Taylor, Abby) (Main Document 4 replaced on 12/12/2022) (Taylor, Abby). Modified on 12/12/2022 to correct deadline. (Taylor, Abby).
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE signed by MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER on 12/09/2022, that Plaintiff in the above-named action be, and is hereby, permitted to file and prosecute said action in this Court without prepayment of fees or giving security therefor, subject to the conditions set forth below. FURTHER ORDERED that, as a condition of Plaintiffs proceeding in forma pauperis, Plaintiff's current custodian and/or trust officer shall, starting with the month of January of 2023, collect, set aside, and pay from Plaintiff's trust account on a continuing basis 20 percent of the deposits to Plaintiff's account until the full filing fee and any costs, should they be assessed at a later date, have been paid in full. FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall send Plaintiff a summons for Defendant Bruscno. Plaintiff must fill out a summons, including an address suitable for service, and then return the summons to the Clerk. FURTHER ORDERED that the United States Marshal, upon return of the properly completed summons shall serve the Complaint on the Defendant.RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915A to the extent that it seeks monetary relief against Defendants Tompson and Crump who are immune from such relief, otherwise dismissed as to those Defendants because it seeks no proper form of relief from them, and allowed to proceed as to Defendant Bruscno. (Taylor, Abby)
|
|
ORDER granting #1 Motion for Application to Proceed IFP Signed by MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER on 12/09/2022.(Taylor, Abby)
|
|
CASE REFERRED for Screening (Butler, Carol)
|
|
Case Assigned to JUDGE CATHERINE C. EAGLES and MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER. (Butler, Carol)
|
|
Filing 2
COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by LEVAN LAFORREST SANDERS. (Attachments: #1 Attachment, #2 Envelope - Front and Back, #3 Envelope - Front and Back)(Butler, Carol)
|
|
Filing 1
APPLICATION to Proceed IFP by LEVAN LAFORREST SANDERS. (Butler, Carol)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
