ABDUL-KAREEM v. CITY OF REIDSVILLE et al
| JAUNAYD ABDUL-KAREEM |
| CITY OF REIDSVILLE, ROBERT A. HASSELL, WENDELL NEVILLE, LEIGH A. BASSINGER and CHRISTOPHER PHILLIPS |
| 1:2023cv00039 |
| January 13, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| L PATRICK AULD |
| WILLIAM L OSTEEN |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by attorney MARIAN D. BURROUGHS on behalf of Defendants LEIGH A. BASSINGER, CITY OF REIDSVILLE, ROBERT A. HASSELL, WENDELL NEVILLE, CHRISTOPHER PHILLIPS (BURROUGHS, MARIAN) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Initial Pretrial Conference Hearing: Initial Pretrial Conference Hearing set for 4/24/2023 09:30 AM in Greensboro Courtroom #1A before MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD. (Garrett, Kim) |
| Filing 10 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand by LEIGH A. BASSINGER, CITY OF REIDSVILLE, ROBERT A. HASSELL, WENDELL NEVILLE, CHRISTOPHER PHILLIPS. (HARTZOG, KATIE) |
| TEXT ORDER granting #9 Motion for Extension of Time. Plaintiff did not timely respond to #9 Motion. As a result, pursuant to Local Rule 7.3(k), the Court treats #9 Motion as unopposed and generally subject to granting as a matter of course. The Court further finds no reason to depart from that general rule in this instance, but instead finds good cause for the requested extension. Accordingly, Defendants City of Reidsville, Robert A. Hassell, in his individual and official capacity, Christopher Phillips, in his individual and official capacity, and Leigh A. Bassinger, in her individual and official capacity, shall answer or otherwise respond by 03/15/2023. Issued by MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD on 03/05/2023. (AULD, L.) |
| Motion Referred to MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD re: #9 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer. (Daniel, J) |
| Filing 9 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by LEIGH A. BASSINGER, CITY OF REIDSVILLE, ROBERT A. HASSELL, WENDELL NEVILLE, CHRISTOPHER PHILLIPS. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order Granting Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint)(HARTZOG, KATIE) |
| Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement. (HARTZOG, KATIE) |
| Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement. (HARTZOG, KATIE) |
| Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement. (HARTZOG, KATIE) |
| Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement. (HARTZOG, KATIE) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by attorney KATIE WEAVER HARTZOG on behalf of Defendants LEIGH A. BASSINGER, CITY OF REIDSVILLE, ROBERT A. HASSELL, WENDELL NEVILLE, CHRISTOPHER PHILLIPS (HARTZOG, KATIE) |
| Filing 3 Notice of Right to Consent. Counsel shall serve the attached form on all parties. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) (Sheets, Jamie) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (Sheets, Jamie) |
| Case ASSIGNED to JUDGE WILLIAM L. OSTEEN, JR and MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD. (Sheets, Jamie) |
| CASE REFERRED to Mediation pursuant to Local Rule 83.9b of the Rules of Practice and Procedure of this Court. Please go to our website under Attorney Information for a list of mediators which must be served on all parties. (Sheets, Jamie) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT (JURY TRIAL DEMANDED) against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANCMDC-3470384.), filed by JAUNAYD ABDUL-KAREEM. (ATWATER, BRANDON) Modified on 1/13/2023 to include full title of document. (Carter, Alexus). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
