PHILLIPS v. KIJAKAZI
| HEATHER PHILLIPS |
| KILOLO KIJAKAZI |
| SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and US ATTORNEY'S OFFICE - SOCIAL SECURITY NOTICING |
| 1:2023cv00052 |
| January 18, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| L PATRICK AULD |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Text Notice of Service in the Social Security Case Pursuant to the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions under 42 U.S.C. 405(g), Rule 3. The Clerk has issued a Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) using the Case Management and Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) system, notifying the appropriate Regional Social Security Administration Office of the General Counsel and the United States Attorney's Office of the case. No summonses shall issue. Answer due 60 days from filing on this notice. Answer/Certified Administrative Record due by 3/21/2023. (Carter, Alexus) |
| Case ASSIGNED to UNASSIGNED and MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD. (Carter, Alexus) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by attorney LINDSAY F. OSTERHOUT on behalf of Plaintiff HEATHER PHILLIPS (OSTERHOUT, LINDSAY) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against KILOLO KIJAKAZI (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANCMDC-3473256), filed by HEATHER PHILLIPS. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 AC Denial) (OSTERHOUT, LINDSAY) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
